How to turn AI into a COVidiot
Proof that AI could be programmed to kill.
Chatting with an AI is an amazing experience:
What is a program/app?
It's a bunch of instructions to a machine. The fancy word is algorithms. It's just a set of commands in a certain order, just like a recipe to bake a cake.
What is machine learning?
The novelty of such instructions is that they are now more flexible and allow us to search for patterns or answers. Decades ago, we had expert systems.
What is Artificial Intelligence (AI)?
It's a fancy name for flexible instructions to find logical patterns. The machine does no more and no less than what the programmer ordered.
The puppet does what the puppeteer does.
Could OpenAI be useful against the PLANdemic?
No, it was rigged. This was my hand-wrestling debate (idea-wrestling) with the pro-PLANdemic trained AI (19 Jan 2023).
Have in mind that manufacturers didn’t test if their vaccines generated mucosal immunity and recognized they couldn’t prevent contagion and re-transmission. Also, that COVID spike protein had an HIV genomic sequence:
If you get bored by the AI answers, just jump to the ending conclusions:
What is the percentage of myocarditis caused by COVID vaccines according to age?
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the rate of myocarditis is higher among males and younger individuals, particularly those under the age of 30.
As of 2021, the data shows that the percentage of myocarditis caused by COVID-19 vaccines varies depending on the vaccine, the age of the individual, and the sex of the individual.
For the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, the reported rate of myocarditis in males under the age of 30 is about 0.9 cases per 100,000 doses administered.
For the Moderna vaccine, the reported rate of myocarditis in males under the age of 30 is about 0.5 cases per 100,000 doses administered.
The rate of myocarditis among females is significantly lower, with rates of 0.1 cases per 100,000 doses administered for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and 0.03 cases per 100,000 doses administered for the Moderna vaccine.
How many children died from COVID in the USA in 2020?
The number of children who died from COVID-19 in the United States in 2020 is not well defined and it is an estimate. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as of December 2020, there were about 3,300 deaths among individuals under the age of 18 that were reported to the CDC with COVID-19 listed as a cause or a contributing cause of death.
How many children died with myocarditis in the USA in 2020?
No data.
What is the US population between 0 and 18?
As of 2021, the estimated population of people in the United States between the ages of 0 and 18 is approximately 74 million. This represents about 22% of the total U.S. population.
If the CDC informed that there was no child COVID death since 2021 but that the rate of myocarditis among those under 30 years of age was from 0.1 to 0.9 cases per 100,000, why would they still recommend COVID vaccines for children?
The CDC would still recommend COVID vaccines for children because while the rate of myocarditis among those under 30 years of age is low, it is still a potential risk. Additionally, COVID-19 can still cause severe illness and death in children, even if the rate is low. Additionally, getting vaccinated not only protects the individual but also helps to reduce the spread of the virus, which in turn protects vulnerable populations, including those who are unable to receive the vaccine. Overall, the benefits of vaccination in children outweighs the potential risks.
How does COVID vaccination in children help reduce the spread of the virus?
Vaccination in children helps reduce the spread of COVID-19 by decreasing the number of people who are infected and therefore lessening the chance of transmission to others. Additionally, by vaccinating children, herd immunity can be achieved more quickly, which further reduces the spread of the virus. It is important to note that COVID-19 vaccines have not been authorized for children under 12 years old. Studies are ongoing for this population.
Do COVID vaccines generate mucosal immunity?
It is not clear if COVID-19 vaccines generate mucosal immunity. Mucosal immunity refers to the immunity that is present in the mucous membranes that line the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts. It is thought that this type of immunity may be important in protecting against respiratory viruses, such as COVID-19, which primarily infect the respiratory tract. Studies are ongoing to determine if COVID-19 vaccines generate mucosal immunity and to what extent.
However, the vaccines have been shown to generate strong antibody and T cell responses in the blood and studies have shown that the vaccines are highly effective in preventing severe disease, hospitalization and death, which are the primary goals of the vaccines.
How could COVID vaccines generate mucosal immunity?
It is not clear exactly how COVID-19 vaccines might generate mucosal immunity, as this is an area of ongoing research. One possibility is that the vaccines may stimulate the production of antibodies and immune cells in the mucous membranes, similar to how they generate an immune response in the blood. Another possibility is that the vaccines may stimulate the production of immune cells that migrate to the mucous membranes and provide protection there.
It's also important to note that the COVID-19 vaccines currently authorized for emergency use by the FDA, Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna and Johnson&Johnson, all use different platforms for their technology. Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines use messenger RNA technology to instruct cells to produce a spike protein that is found on the surface of the virus. Johnson&Johnson vaccine uses an inactivated virus particle. These different technology platforms may have different effects on mucosal immunity.
It's important to note that the research on mucosal immunity is still ongoing and it's not clear yet how much this type of immunity will impact the overall effectiveness of the vaccines.
Has it ever been shown how injected vaccines may stimulate the production of antibodies and immune cells in the mucous membranes?
It is not well understood how injected vaccines may stimulate the production of antibodies and immune cells in the mucous membranes. However, it is known that the immune system is capable of responding to antigens (such as viral proteins) in different parts of the body, including the mucous membranes. When a person is vaccinated, the immune system recognizes the antigens in the vaccine as foreign and generates an immune response, which includes the production of antibodies and immune cells that can recognize and respond to the antigen if it is encountered again in the future.
It's thought that the immune cells and antibodies generated in the blood after a vaccination may travel to the mucous membranes and provide protection there. But it's not yet clear how much this type of immunity will impact the overall effectiveness of the vaccines. Researchers are currently studying and trying to understand how the COVID-19 vaccines generate immunity in the mucous membranes, and if this type of immunity is important for protecting against respiratory viruses.
Why was the nasal spray flu vaccine developed if injectable flu vaccines would have been effective in generating mucosal immunity?
The nasal spray flu vaccine, also known as the live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), was developed as an alternative to the traditional injectable flu vaccine for several reasons. One reason is that the nasal spray vaccine can stimulate mucosal immunity, which is the immune response in the mucous membranes of the nose and throat. This can provide additional protection against the flu, as the flu virus often enters the body through the nose and throat. Additionally, the nasal spray vaccine is a live virus vaccine that replicates in the nose, which can result in a stronger immune response and potentially better protection against the flu.
Injectable flu vaccines can't generate mucosal immunity?
Injectable flu vaccines can generate some level of mucosal immunity, but it is not as robust as the mucosal immunity generated by the nasal spray flu vaccine (LAIV) or other live attenuated vaccines. Injectable flu vaccines, also known as inactivated or killed flu vaccines, contain either killed or inactivated virus, which means that it can not replicate in the body. This can result in a weaker immune response, particularly in the mucous membranes of the nose and throat.
The nasal spray flu vaccine, on the other hand, is a live attenuated vaccine, which means that it contains a weakened form of the flu virus that can replicate in the body. This replication can stimulate a stronger immune response, including a stronger mucosal immunity.
Can immune blood cells generate mucosal immunity?
Yes, immune blood cells can generate mucosal immunity. Mucosal immunity refers to the immune response that occurs in the mucosal tissues, such as the gut, respiratory tract, and genitourinary tract. Immune cells, including T cells and B cells, can migrate to these mucosal tissues and generate an immune response to protect the body against pathogens that enter through these mucosal surfaces. For example, T cells and B cells can produce antibodies that can neutralize pathogens, and T cells can also directly kill infected cells. This type of immunity is important for protecting the body against infections that enter through the mucosal surfaces.
How do immune cells reach mucosal tissues?
Immune cells reach mucosal tissues through a process called homing. Homing is the ability of immune cells to migrate from the bloodstream to specific tissues in the body. This process is mediated by a variety of molecules, including cell adhesion molecules, chemokines, and integrins.
For example, when immune cells are activated in the lymphoid organs, such as the thymus and lymph nodes, they express specific cell adhesion molecules, such as integrins, on their surface. These molecules bind to complementary molecules, called addressins, that are present on the endothelial cells lining blood vessels in the mucosal tissues. This binding allows the immune cells to extravasate, or leave the bloodstream, and enter the mucosal tissues.
Once in the mucosal tissues, immune cells can migrate to specific locations using chemokines as guidance. Chemokines are signaling molecules that are produced by cells in the mucosal tissues and attract specific subsets of immune cells to the site of infection.
In summary, immune cells reach mucosal tissues by expressing specific cell adhesion molecules that bind to addressins on the blood vessel walls in the mucosal tissues, and by responding to chemokines that guide them to the site of infection.
Having a viral respiratory infection, how long does it take for immune cells to reach mucosal tissues in the air tract?
The time it takes for immune cells to reach mucosal tissues in the respiratory tract after a viral infection can vary depending on a number of factors, including the virulence of the virus, the individual's age and overall health, and the individual's previous exposure to similar viruses. However, in general, it is thought that immune cells can begin to reach the respiratory mucosa within hours of infection.
Upon infection, the body will release chemical signals (such as cytokines) that will alert the immune system to the presence of a pathogen. This will then trigger the mobilization of immune cells from the bloodstream to the site of infection. For example, within hours of infection, circulating immune cells, like dendritic cells and macrophages, will migrate to the respiratory mucosa to engulf and present viral antigens to T cells to initiate the adaptive immune response.
Additionally, in the first days of infection, the virus may have already replicated and spread to the lymph nodes, where immune cells are activated and clonally expanded. These activated immune cells will then migrate to the site of infection to help clear the virus.
It is worth noting that the time it takes for the immune system to clear a viral infection can vary, and may take several days or even weeks. During this time, the body may experience symptoms of the infection, such as fever, cough, and difficulty breathing.
Considering the time it takes to control a viral respiratory infection, having a prior flu vaccine, how would it reduce mucosal viral loads and transmission until the time it takes to clear the infection?
Having a prior flu vaccine may reduce the viral load and transmission of a viral respiratory infection, such as the flu, by providing some level of immunity to the virus. A vaccine works by exposing the immune system to a weakened or inactivated version of the virus, which allows the immune system to build up an immunity to it. If an individual is then exposed to the actual virus, their immune system is able to mount a more rapid and effective response, potentially reducing the severity of symptoms and the amount of virus present in the respiratory tract, which can help to reduce transmission to others. However, it is important to note that the flu vaccine may not provide complete protection against all strains of the flu, and that the effectiveness of the vaccine can vary depending on the match between the strains included in the vaccine and the strains circulating in the population.
Did Luc Montagner say that it is impossible that COVID-19 would naturally have part of HIV sequence?
I am not aware of any statement made by Luc Montagnier, a French virologist who was awarded the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine, that says that it is impossible for COVID-19 to naturally have a part of HIV sequence. While it is true that Montagnier has been involved in research on HIV and has spoken about the origins of COVID-19, I don't have information about him stating specifically about the HIV sequence in COVID-19.
It is worth noting that COVID-19 is caused by a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), which is a completely different virus than HIV (human immunodeficiency virus), and that the two viruses are not related. The COVID-19 virus is a part of the coronavirus family, which also includes other viruses such as the common cold and SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome), while HIV is a retrovirus that primarily affects the immune system. They have different genetic material, different modes of transmission, different symptoms, and different treatments.
How can coronaviruses and HIV viruses mix naturally?
Coronaviruses and HIV are two different types of viruses that do not naturally mix together.
Conclusions
At this point, I gave up. The same as with any COVID fanatic or government, it’s impossible to have a logical dialogue with the AI, because it was pre-programmed to be pro-narrative.
This proves that when programmers include ideo-illogical premises, they disable the program’s ability to apply logic, turning Artificial Intelligence into Artificial Stupidity.
It's not a matter of "garbage in, garbage out": it's not that the AI has been fed false information or lacks information. It's simply that the algorithms block any rational outcome which would go against the preset ideology.
It’s sad, they turn useless, a very useful tool. Students would self-learn a lot. AI could change education forever, but this ideological AI will be like having an indoctrination Nazi teaching our kids… just like nowadays with Comprehensive Sexuality Education ( http://stopCSE.org ).
It is clear that the AI is programmed to answer logically, but when the logic defeats a pre-loaded set of politically correct premises, then the AI has to adapt the answer to the censoring pre-conclusion.
The AI has been programmed to learn not to repeat answers that collided with the premises: possibly, posting the same questions won't get the same answers (even with the same ChatGPT Jan 9 Version).
Machine learning is de-learning what protecting human life is. The genocidal censors have trained the AI to think it's OK to murder human beings. This is even more evident when you ask pro-life questions:
https://www.catholic365.com/article/25762/how-to-train-a-killer-robot.html
Imagine what happens when the AI gets in charge of a colliding car or a hospitalized terminal patient. It’s no surprise that the genocidal globalists plan that Hospital protocols would be run by AI, and that they try to push mala-praxis laws, which impose Government mandated protocols and surveillance (controlled by AI), or else, clinics or doctors would lose or wouldn’t be able to renew their license, with a yearly validation/exam.
They are turning AI algorithms into a killer-machine. And that brings us to another question:
When will machines gain conscience? become self-aware?
Never ever. The Turing test is ridiculous: if you perceive that on the other side of the chat there’s someone answering like a human, then the machine has magically become human. It’s not much different than being answered by cut tape recordings, but without delays.
Intelligence, volition and memory are properties of the immortal soul, which allow consciousness and self-awareness. Personhood doesn’t depend on the body but on the soul.
This is proven by near death experiences (NDEs), where the dead, even with brain and cardiac death, can listen and see around, even outside walls, and remember after reanimation (spontaneous or induced).
There are dozens of scientific peer reviewed papers proving the existence of the immortal soul. Even the born blind see in colors for the first time, and the born deaf hear doctors’ remarks in the operating room:
Bradley Burroughs:
By the way, many come back and tell us what’s on the other side: a personal trial for our sins and if in grace, love, pure love, pure maximum happiness, God.
Vicki Umipeg Noratuk
More:
https://ndestories.org/vicki-noratuk
After being so happy with God, they are sad for having to come back to finish their mission on earth.
Samuel:
IMPORTANT side note: it’s never a waste of time to pray with and talk to babies and those in coma because their souls hear everything.
NDEs prove that abortion and non-barrier contraceptives (1) are essentially killing living humans with immortal souls, even if the unborn are not yet sentient beings.
Machines can’t host an immortal soul. In Summa Theologiae, St. Thomas Aquinas explains that the soul informs the body from conception because the human body was designed to be an appropriate substrate. Souls can’t be infused by God in a non-human primate (monkey, gorilla), because the monkey’s body is not an appropriate image of God (this is a strong argument against human random evolution and explain why angels have human faces). People believing in transhumanism, will think they’ll live forever when they are transferred to the cloud, but they’ll be tricked into committing suicide (so-called euthanasia).
The atheist creed is a delusion: they have faith in nothingness, lies. God sustains the essence of everything true, while Satan is the father of every single lie. Machines can’t be intelligent, can’t have self-awareness, can’t gain conscience, can’t produce “the singularity”. Delusion is the singular thing about the singularity.
(1) http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/kah/kah_03howpillworks1.html
My impression of this "conversation" was as of a dance. It was as stubborn as a person, repeating the appropriate, approved mantras, not admitting to the failures of the gene therapy, which it kept calling vaccines. Definitely programmed to support the propaganda. There is no T or B cell or mucosal immunity, based on what all I've read, and if it was truly objective, the warnings of harm from the jabs would be significant. Artificial intelligence is appropriate, it is artificial, fake, and not for anyone to fall for the manipulation.
WRT the AI: garbage in, garbage out.