PCR casedemic, ratting RATs

Why was it so important to exaggerate numbers by over 100%?

Full article with images here: http://bit.ly/research2000

PCR casedemic, not COVID

Up to 50% of COVID cases could be false positives by PCR tests taking influenza as COVID: [1]

The inventor of the PCR said it wasn’t useful for diagnosis. The PCR enhances any genetic material in the sample. The more cycles, exponentially the more false positives, even reaching 100% false positives. False positivity greatly increases after 45 cyles. WHO only recommended to reduce cycles when vaccines were rolled out, so the reduction in contagion and deaths would be attributable to vaccines.

The CDC recognized that all PCR tests were based on a computer model, not a real isolated virus.

The president of Tanzania tried the PCR on Papaya and motor oil and they turned positive on the WHO machine, and kicked them out of the country.

The FDA granted EUA of PCR tests by only testing negative cross-reactivity with MERS-CoV, not other influenza genetic material: “The panel contains one heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 strain and one heat-inactivated MERS-CoV strain in cell culture media… The blinded samples (T2 to T5) are also tested per a protocol provided by the FDA, to confirm the LoD determined for T1 and evaluate cross-reactivity with MERS-CoV virus… assessment of assay performance using the FDA SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel allows for a consistent determination of the relative sensitivity of these tests and cross-reactivity with MERS-CoV virus.

While the FDA SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel helps determine the comparative performance among authorized tests, the panel is not a replacement for the analytical and clinical validation recommendations the FDA has provided in the EUA templates[2]. For example, the panel only includes one strain of SARS-CoV-2 and one cross-reactant, MERS-CoV. (Even if MERS is quite different to COVID19, in some tests) Cross-reactivity with MERS-CoV was observed.” [3]

The CDC established that the vaccinated shouldn’t be controlled for PCR.

21 Jul 2021, the CDC recognized the PCR tests take influenza as COVID19: “After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 ...  CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.” [4]

PCR gives false positive by cross-reactivity with influenza, prior influenza and harmless non-COVID19 coronaviruses (even a year before): for no scientific reason, false positive people were being prosecuted like lepers, untouchables, escaped convicts or bio-terrorists. Even worse, their close contacts were presumed guilty without any proof and without any chance to prove viral-innocence. Contact tracing was a man-hunt machine built for bio-terrorizing the population.

Why did the FDA authorize PCR testing without even challenging the test against influenza... in over a year?

This explains why influenza disappeared in most countries with high PCR testing: it was a false positive PCR plandemic, involving all authorities. Otherwise, how could it be explained that after that July notice not a single state sued the federal government for huge economic damages, for establishing draconian measures based on nothing?

What about those who were quarantined for 15 days for nothing, taken as COVID by the PCR test. The whole school class or the office/factory personnel had to stay at home 15 days because of a single false PCR!

Under a US Presidential order, all in-flying passengers were and are required a PCR test before boarding and since 1 Nov 2021, with only a 3-days prior to boarding for double jabbed and 1-day for the sub-human rest, even if they know the PCR doesn’t work, preventing thousands to lose their business or vacation travel because of a more than certain false positive.

Ratting RATs

In May 2020, the FDA issued the firsts EUAs for rapid antigen tests (RATs), also called lateral flow tests (LFTs) or antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs), by Quidel and Abbot. [5]

Why did most authorities insist in PCRs with huge false positivity with non-contagious viral debris, instead of RATs, with self-testing, very low false positivity (98%-99% specificity[6]), high sensitivity (84% compared to same-day viral cultures[7]), low cost compared to other COVID-19 testing and a 5–30 minutes result?

The answer is simple: Injuring PCR deep swabbing and fear mongering: 50% of positive PCR tests were negative with RATs.[8]

Canada delayed the EUA approval to Oct 2020 (6 months). [9] WHO delayed 5 months (Sep 2020) for its first recommendations[10] and 7 months (10 Nov 2020) for the first evaluation. [11] UK, Nov 2020. [12] EU, Dec 2020. [13]

Did they delay the tech as much as possible in order to maximize damage and cases by PCR?

---

[1] https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/great-2020-seasonal-fluinfluenza-disappearing-act

[2] https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-emergency-use-authorizations-medical-devices/vitro-diagnostics-euas#covid19ivdTemplates

[3] https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-covid-19-and-medical-devices/sars-cov-2-reference-panel-comparative-data

[4] https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html

[5] Hahn SM, Shuren JE (). Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Authorizes First Antigen Test to Help in the Rapid Detection of the Virus that Causes COVID-19 in Patients. 9 May 2020 Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-authorizes-first-antigen-test-help-rapid-detection-virus-causes

[6] Khalid MF, Selvam K, et al. Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010110 PMC 8774565. PMID 35054277.

Brümmer LE, Katzenschlager S, et al. "Accuracy of rapid point-of-care antigen-based diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression analyzing influencing factors". 2022 PLoS Med. 19 (5): e1004011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004011 PMID 35617375.

Tapari A, Braliou GG, Papaefthimiou M, Mavriki H, Kontou PI, Nikolopoulos GK, Bagos PG (2022). "Performance of Antigen Detection Tests for SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". Diagnostics (Basel). 12 (6): 1388. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061388 PMID 35741198.

[7] Chu VT, Schwartz NG, Donnelly MA, et al. Comparison of Home Antigen Testing With RT-PCR and Viral Culture During the Course of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. 2022 JAMA Intern Med. 182 (7): 701–709. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1827 PMC 9055515. PMID 35486394.

[8] Service RF. Coronavirus antigen tests: quick and cheap, but too often wrong?. 22 May 2020 Science.

https://www.science.org/content/article/coronavirus-antigen-tests-quick-and-cheap-too-often-wrong

Saxena R. Why India's rapid antigen tests for coronavirus are like 'flipping a coin. 17 Aug 2020 ThePrint. https://theprint.in/india/why-indias-rapid-antigen-tests-for-coronavirus-are-like-flipping-a-coin/483203/

Halliday J, Pidd H. Plans for 30-minute Covid testing in England halted amid accuracy fears. 22 Dec 2020. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/22/plans-for-30-minute-covid-lateral-flow-tests-in-england-halted-over-accuracy-fears

[9] Tasker JP. Health Canada approves 1st rapid antigen COVID-19 test, feds plan to buy 20 million. 6 Oct 2020 CBC News https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/health-canada-antigen-test-abbott-1.5751939

[10] World Health Organization. Antigen-detection in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection using rapid immunoassays. Interim guidance. 11 Sep 2020 (PDF). https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/334253/WHO-2019-nCoV-Antigen_Detection-2020.1-eng.pdf

World Health Organization. Global partnership to make available 120 million affordable, quality COVID-19 rapid tests for low- and middle-income countries. 28 Sep 2020 https://www.who.int/news/item/28-09-2020-global-partnership-to-make-available-120-million-affordable-quality-covid-19-rapid-tests-for-low--and-middle-income-countries

[11] World Health Organization. SARS-CoV-2 Antigen detecting rapid diagnostic test implementation projects. 10 Nov 2020 https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/sars-cov-2-antigen-detecting-rapid-diagnostic-test-implementation-projects

[12] University of Oxford. Oxford University and PHE confirm lateral flow tests show high specificity and are effective at identifying most individuals who are infectious. 11 Nov 2020. https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2020-11-11-oxford-university-and-phe-confirm-lateral-flow-tests-show-high-specificity-and-are

[13] European Commission.Coronavirus: Commission puts forward rules on rapid antigen tests and secures 20 million tests for Member States. 18 Dec 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_20_2483