Maybe some are but most know exactly what’s going on with this state called Israel!
First, from what I have learned to date about the absolute fraud that’s been committed against our country, beginning in 1947 when the UN voted to give 53% of Palestine land to the Jews, which at that time, many countries were sick of the “Usury” tactics against unsuspecting individuals amongst a plethora of other, God forsaken evilness’s committed against individuals as well!
It’s taken me better than 50 years to learn, what should have been learned decades ago. Why?
Many reasons, one of which is Robert Maxwell. He owned the publishing company which published the educational material millions of Americans were taught by. Lying by omission is as bad if not worse than flat out lying by. This is why so many Americans believed, we must stand with Israel! AYKM?
I don’t care if it was Italians or Russian or Portuguese, whoever it was, we the people were lied to deliberately and for decades!
We’re still being lied to the same way as this began!
Why? Why have they gotten so sloppy now? What is it that allows them to control our Congressional members en masse and of course our president? Money and lots of money!
Our president took $250 million dollars from Miriam Adelson! How many people realize this? How many people realize, America first was all slogan?
I believe it’s too late for “We the People” to take action. Argentina, Australia and nearly every Middle Eastern country has suffered because of Israel!
Oh they’re great at blaming others! It’s their MO! Check history and learn how many times they have blamed Muslim’s or Iran or Islamic terrorist? It’s despicable that we are now learning the truth!
Of course Max Blumenthal can provide so much more than I could ever imagine. What I do know is this, Muslims are NOT OUR PROBLEM NOR are they the world’s problems!
We’ve all been played like a concert pianist plays before a sell out crowd! Shame on Israel and any Jewish person who can’t see who they are connected with.
I would renounce judaism in a heartbeat from what I’ve learned is being done to us in the name of Judaism!
The acts of such despicable people would make Satan very proud!
if your sick of getting lied, maybe not read this article here cause it is full of it too. really i got pissed this morning reading that much amount of folklore and bs about everything, literaly everthing in this article is false. Old god werent pagan, they described science in allegory. for a scientific article he should know. adam quincy was working with freemasons while claiming being against the masons ( its called gain of function ). the freemasons division back then was a stunt made by intern brother, like quincy's close one... That star of david is NOT associated with solomon at ALL. it is medieval slander and magical creation to help there witch hunt back then. people who associate stuff from an era to the other are lazy in their homework and dont take time to study the episteme of everything they share i guess. They are blinded by the propaganda, not the ones of today, but the ones back then. and yes there was even more in these times then nowaday.
so all in here is a freaking no no, its lie over lie, and it use biblical enforcing and demonisation of everything else. Really talk about scientific regression! I think you'd be less in rage if not believing these polarizing argument he made today slandering everything and everyone on the name of christian dogma.....
ok this article really pissed me off so here is a clean version of what i tried to explain in my blind rage. AI will clean my mes up lol : this is science ironicly:
If you’re tired of being misled, this article unfortunately won’t help. It mixes folklore, theological polemic, and historical inaccuracies while presenting itself as “scientific.”
Ancient gods were not “pagan deceptions” in the simplistic sense implied here; they functioned as symbolic and allegorical frameworks through which early societies encoded astronomical, mathematical, and natural knowledge. Reducing them to demonic caricatures is not scholarship, but confessional rhetoric.
Several historical claims are also misleading. For example, the Star of David has no documented association with King Solomon in the biblical or archaeological record. Its connection to Solomon emerges much later, in medieval magical and polemical literature, not in Iron Age Israel.
The article further relies on anachronistic associations—projecting later theological categories onto earlier cultures—without regard for historical epistemology. This method produces moral judgments, not historical understanding.
Finally, many references used are circular and apologetic in nature, citing sources that share the same theological presuppositions rather than independent academic research. This creates the appearance of evidence without actually testing the claims.
Overall, the piece does not advance scientific or historical inquiry; it reinforces a polarized narrative by demonizing entire traditions through a narrowly defined religious lens. That approach is not only inaccurate—it represents a step backward for serious discussion.
Proof that you really didn't read or understand the article is that it clearly states that the there's no evidence of the star being related to Solomon!
I rade the article, my AI too, we worked on it this morning. A single sentence of advise then a hundred text of convincing argument is clearly a way to state a claim without being pointed at it. But it still is the intent.
So first you are wrong since i rade it twice not once.
Then did you read it? Cause if you are validating these erroneous claims with no datation. This circular apologetic thinking with what is shown here, well why argue…
It will go no where
But if you wish to i will proove my point. Because i clearly understand the article. Its in fact bringing forth lots of folklore that are in my daily studies.
I’ll inform you up front of what brings screech to my ears and where i will debate:
Claiming all past god were pagans! Then using greek (helenist language)
To promote most argument.
These gods were noble not pagan, only Baal and cybele are and guess at whom they belong? Christian before they were name christian.
Cybele is magna mater later absorb by roman and they also absorb christian, baal is many and all root in levant in israel in the canaanite. The christian ancestor indirectly.
Hellenist temple arent of the same distastefull desir to sacrifice children. As their god are wise counsel, allegory that gave Hestia a homebound symbol and Zeus as yaweh often took is role.
Such pagan right?
My problem is not with the star of solomon, its with ALL the fakery in it using that symbol for introducing the confusion on all other domain.
Hey aint that a proof that tou didnt read my answer or understood any of it? Cause the AI listing down below is giving direction on ALL falacy i found. No one cares bout the star since its the obvious lie.
The Old Testament is clear: all pagan gods were demons
Deuteronomy 32:16-17 (The Song of Moses)
They stirred him to jealousy with strange gods; with abominations they provoked him to anger. They sacrificed to demons (shedim in Hebrew) that were no gods, to gods they had never known, to new gods that had come recently, whom your fathers had never dreaded.
Psalm 106:36-37 (Recounting Israel's sins)
They served their idols, which became a snare to them. They sacrificed their sons and their daughters to demons (or 'devils' in KJV)."
Leviticus 17:7
"So they shall no more sacrifice their sacrifices to goat demons (Hebrew se'irim, also translated as satyrs/devils), after whom they whore…"
Psalm 96:5
For all the gods (demons, daimonia in LXX1 Greek) of the nations are worthless idols, but the Lord made the heavens.
1 Corinthians 10:19-21 (Paul addressing idol food and pagan sacrifices)
What do I imply then? That food offered to idols is anything, or that an idol is anything? No, I imply that what pagans sacrifice they sacrifice to demons (Greek: daimonia) and not to God. I do not want you to be participants with demons. You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. You cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons.
cf. 1 Corinthians 8:4-6; Acts 19:26
Revelation 9:20
The rest of mankind, who were not killed by these plagues, did not repent of the works of their hands nor give up worshiping demons and idols of gold and silver and bronze and stone and wood, which cannot see or hear or walk.
The Bible is clear: all pagan gods were demonic.2 And that explains the widespread human sacrifices in pagan rituals, sometimes involving pyramids (a typical masonic sign). Except Satanic inspiration, how else could anyone explain different cultures building sacrificial pyramids separated by thousands of miles, even oceans?
Am i glad you know 8 languages, so now you showed in your own text my answer. What is demons? right? they are daimones for the hellenist. no demons like christian interprets it. What is pagan? it is rustic peasant nothing more. You see demons and devils where there is none. No wonder being blinded by the light of the holy god , such a light everyone bows in fear as i rade often hehe!
here is another of my 0% intelligence 100% artificial oracle that all on earth use including our own elites in Washington dc( thats where oracle is) So if they that dumb, i wonder why humanity is using them every where possible.
but thats another subject, lets stay focus on hellenist vs greek will we?
So your claim is all gods are demons (daimones) because the bible said so. Remember when you said my arguments were circulars? now that today you sent me another loads of biblical argument like yesterday... do you understand the definition of circular? its when all your argument points back to your one and only source.
Back at this here is my riddle sent to ya yesterday, you didnt answered it and it made me sad. i put time to found that genius riddle! please try to answer it at the best of your knowledge, you can just put the riddle in any AI and they will get it. These no brain tool will get it so it is not an hard feature to achieve. thus riddle me this professor:
what is the common point between Celcus , Porphyry and julian the apostate? the answer i give you a hint, is related to my view on your claim.
I'll leave this round for you to answer back with the AI giving definition to what i bring today about your word choice: Demons-Daimones
(in hope you will use others sources then the bible, it kinda miss the point by validating its own tricks of giving re-interpreted definition to words)
1. What Daimon Originally Meant (Hellenic Essence)
Etymology: From δαίω (daiō) – “to divide, allot.” A daimon is a portion of divine fate assigned to mortals.
Function: Not evil—but intermediary, wise, often protective.
Socrates’ daimonion: an inner voice warning against error.
Hesiod: Daimones are souls of the Golden Age, now guardians of justice on Earth.
Plato: Eros is a daimon—the spirit between lack and fulfillment.
Cosmic role: Embodies balance, guidance, and the unseen order linking human action to cosmic law (Moira, Dikē).
✦ “In Hellas, a daimon was the whisper between thought and action… not a devil, but a compass.”
2. When & How the Meaning Swapped
3rd–2nd c. BCE: Jewish translators of the Septuagint (LXX) rendered Hebrew shedim (foreign gods/idols) as Greek δαιμόνια (daimonia).
Why? To make Yahwist polemic intelligible to Greek-speaking audiences—using a term already ambiguous, but now loaded with suspicion.
1st c. CE: Paul (1 Cor. 10:20) declares pagan sacrifices are “to demons (daimonia)”—theological warfare, not anthropology.
Late Antiquity → Medieval Christianity: Daimon fully collapses into “demon”—malevolent, Satanic, deceptive.
✦ This wasn’t revelation—it was lexical colonization.
3. The Biblical Hijacking (Your Core Argument, Honed)
The Bible never engages foreign gods on their own terms. It redefines them through Yahwist exclusivity.
Passages like Deut. 32:17 or Ps. 106:37 are confessional rhetoric, not historical analysis.
Calling Baal, Zeus, or Isis “demons” is like calling the Nile “Satan’s river” because Pharaoh opposed Moses—it confuses theological narrative with ontological reality.
✦ “To reduce Athena to a demon is not piety—it’s spiritual vandalism.”
You probably didnt go this far in the read of my answer so i will permit myself here the same you just gave your stance the right too.
Let me tell you, it is not hellenist that erased chirstian and burned their book and legacy to ground, it is not so called pagan that brought shame to olympics by cheating in them and claiming undeserved victory. That are the christians works after having lived the same process supposedly! How can these soul of infinite goodness be so wrathfull right?
The pagans... are the one who created the last definition of this word, and pointing it at everything that wasnt them. Again just copying the hellenist who called barbarian any other spoken language outside their circle.
So to follow up on my AI, back then they colonized a new lexicon, what you base all your reasoning on. A false understanding of everyword. Arthur Conan Doyle had a sentence for that:
you see but do not observe.
In your case and with words i'd say:
You hear but dont understand, the truth ringing beneath the words.
Would you like us to go over the TRUE definition of canon & kanon, of Logos? of Satan? of Hell? Ekklesia? Apostole? i recovered many anamnesis and they all point toward the same story. one that All of our past historian kept buried under pressure of churches dominion, or burned it simply.
Can you see what i am bringing forward? Are you denying that this corruption of word did happen?
Blah blah, but no matter how many words, even if you don't believe in the Word of God, you can't hide that pagan gods involved human sacrifices and that's demonic
The archaeological timeline you've mapped here completely reframes the standard narrative. What stands out is how the hexagram predates any Jewish association by millennia showing up in Mesopotamian seals Hindu yantras and Islamic architecture first. The connection to Remphan Saturn worship and Moloch through biblical texts like Acts 7:43 and Amos 5:26-27 puts the symbol's adoption in 1897 by the Zionist movement in a starkly different light. The gematria breakdown linking to 666 and Saturn as the sixth planet creates uncomfortable parallels that most mainstream sources won't touch. Worth noting that Orthodox Jewish communities often reject this symbol in favor of the menorah which has actual biblical provenance.
"Are Jews are being used for nefarious purposes without knowing it?"
Maybe it's everyone else who doesn't Know.
There are actually 3 types of Judaism: Torah Judaism (the original, focused on the OT), Talmud Judaism (developed between the 2nd and 6th centuries, focused on Talmud as the rulebook, OT as background) and Zohar/Kabala Judaism (from 13th-16th century onwards, a "mystical approach" towards the OT).
In practical terms the Kabala is a book of magic. Magic was of course banned by God in the OT but Kabalists call their magic practices "holy" and just like that they make it kosher. They make magic amulets and recite incantations inside drawings made with chalk on the ground. The whole cosmology of the Kabala is basically polytheism, leading them to practices like simulating sex with the female aspect of God. The creation of golems is a kabalistic concept; even if you don't believe golems can actually be created, the Kabala has the magic recipe. Kabalists have also revived folk customs banned by rabbis in centuries past, such as the transferring of one's sins to the chicken and swinging it over the head three times before sacrificing it.
If you saw a Haitian or a Wiccan do any of the things described above you'd have no problem recognizing it as "magic" and "pagan". They certainly don't have anything to do with the God of Abraham, Jesus and Muhammad. There's nothing but condemnation of such practices in all Abrahamic religion source books: the OT, the NT and the Quran.
The Kabala is practiced by a majority of Orthodox Jews today and has widely influenced Judaism. Many daily and weekly practices, whose origins are kabalistic, have become mainstream Jewish custom, especially in Sephardic and Hasidic communities, and to a large extent in Ashkenazi Orthodoxy.
It's not just the star or the Kabala. There's also the pyramid with the all seeing eye on their supreme court building. Disrespecting God's commandments and destroying God's creation (the opposite of worshipping!). The insistence that the third temple be built on the Temple Mount - there is no reason they can't build it anywhere else but they believe that it is a portal between worlds. God can be worshipped anywhere, there's no need for a portal, what is a portal for but a door to welcome... who?
Excellent breakdown and explanation of things regarding this religious group of people or the claimed ethnicity of this group of people, whichever one they claim to be? 👍
Freemasonry is Jewish controlled & serves Jewish ends. Upper level Masons know it. The top of the Masonic pyramid is B'nai B'rith, for Jews only.
"...We have founded many secret associations, which all work for our purpose, under our orders and our direction. We have made it an honour, a great honour, for the Gentiles to join us in our organisations, which are, thanks to our gold, flourishing now more than ever. Yet it remains our secret that those Gentiles who betray their own and most precious interests, by joining us in our plot, should never know that those associations are of our creation, and that they serve our purpose…” - The Plot Against the Church, 1936
I checked the sources of every single quote. I checked that one before the article (which took me 40 human hours of research): that quote seems fake. No credible source anywhere
"Freemasonry is a Jewish establishment, whose history, grades, official appointments, passwords, and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end." - Rabbi Isaac Mayer Wise, in The Israelite in America, 1866
Kolbe's quotes are real but he's basing them on a debunked book.
Rabbi Mayer Wise quote:
Attribution and Date: The quote appears in The Israelite Vol. 2, No. 5 (August 3, 1855, pp. 28–29), not 1866 as stated in your query (the 1866 date is a common error in secondary sources). Some citations list March 8, 1866, or August 3, 1866, but these seem to stem from misremembering or propagation errors in later books and websites.
Context and Accuracy: This is not Wise's own statement—it's a misattribution. Wise was reviewing an anonymous pamphlet (possibly by a converted Jew named Dr. Bernard or a similar author) that claimed Freemasonry's Jewish origins. Wise quotes the line from the pamphlet but expresses skepticism, writing: "We are not a little puzzled to know how this Order can be Jewish... We doubt it, because we have found the institution to be of a cosmopolitan character and before we believe the assertion, we require proof. If the author of the pamphlet can furnish proofs, we promise to believe him."
Wise, a Scottish Rite Mason himself, was defending Freemasonry's universal nature against the pamphlet's claims.
Evolution and dinosaurs were promoted to cover all the nephilim giant bones being dug up in the 1800s. Their Satanic lies can't hold up if that goes mainstream. Many will run straight to God and Jesus just knowing they were lied to about their existence. It's one of their biggest fears when it was the 'Kabaal's' intention to get us all to act as uninitiated satanists and send ourselves as far removed from our Father and Creator as possible -- to hell. (Be not of the world as it says, that's why.)
It is most definitely a prime witch symbol. As for Solomon we really don't have to infer that much. The guy had 1000 women, most from pagan, shamanic peoples led astray by demon nephilim spirits -- what became of the giant "mighty men". They called it ancestor worship, replete with house god idols, but it was always goetia.
The demons use us out of spite to keep us forever separate of God like they are, since they were abominations and a corruption of our genome, never loved by the REAL Father. Everything revolves around that, including the use of that symbol for a (very) hotline to them in ritual.
Anyone into the 11:11 phenomenon? Read this whole chapter.
1 Kings 11:11 "Wherefore the LORD said unto Solomon, Forasmuch as this is done of thee, and thou hast not kept my covenant and my statutes, which I have commanded thee, I will surely rend the kingdom from thee, and will give it to thy servant."
No. The reason God ordered to wipe out some tribes is because of:
a) intergenerational curse
b) mixing usually involved mixing with idolatry
Those innocent victims could reach heaven but it was essential to preserve the bloodline to enable the saving of the world (even those pagan tribes) through Jesus.
I do not care for the vengeful angry YHWY character in the old testament. This character called humans dirt.
I much prefer the first creation story in Genius 1
Where the Elohim makes us in their own image and likeness. They made man and woman together as equals. Not one ruling over another. YHWY hates women. Jesus loves women.
Folks really need to start reading the Bible. Jesus never ever called his father YHWH , Jesus referred to his father as Abba Father. Not YHWH father.
Ludicrous article full of crap. Anyone who takes this nonsense seriously needs help. Slander and slurs against Israel reveal his real motive. Israel is a great example of what the world should be and has contributed mightily to the world's benefit. This guy is either psychotic or just a garden variety fool motivated by baseless hatred.
If there's any error, please quote. I have nothing against Jews in general, except Netanyahu/Mileikowsky who is a war criminal responsible for the Gaza genocide. In fact, I've got many Jewish friends, and as a Bible following Christian, I know we have the moral duty to defend the descent of Jakob. I'll write about that in future article.
You’re talking about the mother goddess cult, the serpent cult they did human sacrifices. Now there was a time when the Vikings did those after living amongst the natives races that worship the mother goddess serpent, cults. It’s all in the archaeological record.
You’ve been brainwashed for decades by the church almost a century now
This kind of academia bogus narrative started about 150 years ago
You’d be so surprised with our true history is going back 4200 BC
Did you know ham Noah son had sex with his mother and produced children?
And they were Giants and what I mean by that they were 12 feet tall 15 feet
Jehovah is a demon. The Bible is not what you think it is most of it’s copy and paste from the Babylonian library. It was compiled in third century BC.
The majority of the information after World War II is misleading, and it choreographed misinformation from academia Fred
You should invest your time in archaeology and linguistic scholarship prior to World War II and go back even further to the late 19th century
Start with L A Waddell
archaeology oriented to Bible chronology always stumbles over itself, trying to fit circles into square holes
No such thing as Jehova, it's Yaweh or similar. The more you study the more you'll understand how confused you are. Start by sources believing in the Word of God, for example Biblical archeology
this article is not scientific at all for a scientific progress claim in your name! I am completly shocked by the numerous lies and what you brought forward in this piece. ITs not science, its apologetism in disguise. You are shaming the world of science by trying to use it to promote religious zealotism. i dont even want to waste my time countering every false claim here it would take me the day and i got work to do , on real matters. not lie, i rather work on truth.
So if you are wise and scientific, you just lied to your audience knowingly, if your a blind faith zealots, you are claiming you know truth and lie to yourself thus lie to us. I suggest more study.
So i'll leave you an AI answer after her having read your piece. Please take note, she will rigorously step over every claim you did with probly a good heart intent, but surely a blind faith:
ps: by the way, next time you produce and article, send it into an AI for a double check, it will CLEARLY tell you the same it did with me this morning when i shared your piece... it will tell you were there is a problematic with it, in your case perticularly today... many problematic.
Hermès — voici un résumé clair, neutre et méthodologique des principaux points fallacieux de l’article, formulé de manière présentable, sans attaque personnelle, et en restant strictement scientifique.
Résumé des principaux points problématiques de l’article
1. Confusion systématique des registres
L’article mélange sans distinction :
théologie confessionnelle,
histoire des religions,
archéologie,
symbolique géométrique,
démonologie,
numérologie,
politique moderne.
👉 Or ces domaines n’obéissent pas aux mêmes critères de vérité.
Un argument théologique interne (ex. « la Bible dit que… ») ne peut pas servir de preuve historique ou scientifique externe.
2. Transformation de récits religieux en faits historiques
Plusieurs récits explicitement légendaires (ex. Lettre d’Aristée, démons païens, miracles de traduction) sont présentés comme des événements historiques avérés, sans signaler leur statut réel dans la recherche académique.
👉 C’est une erreur épistémique majeure :
mythe ≠ histoire.
3. Usage abusif du principe d’association
L’article construit des chaînes du type :
symbole ancien → usage païen → condamnation biblique → démon → Satan → institutions modernes
Sans démonstration causale, seulement par juxtaposition.
👉 C’est un sophisme par contamination : la proximité symbolique est traitée comme une identité ontologique.
4. Anachronismes et rétroprojections
Des concepts modernes (Satan, 666, planètes numérotées, conspiration globale) sont projetés sur des périodes antiques qui ne partageaient ni ces cadres conceptuels ni ces cosmologies.
Exemple typique : lier Saturne comme “6e planète” à des symboles antiques alors que le modèle héliocentrique est postérieur de deux millénaires.
👉 C’est historiquement invalide.
5. Fausse matérialité archéologique
L’article présente des objets modernes ou invérifiables (reproductions, objets commerciaux, images sans provenance) comme preuves archéologiques.
👉 Un artefact :
sans provenance,
sans publication académique,
sans contexte stratigraphique,
vendu sur une plateforme commerciale,
n’a aucune valeur scientifique.
6. Réduction idéologique des religions antiques
Les divinités et systèmes symboliques non bibliques sont réduits à :
nie les apports documentés des cultures antiques à la science, aux mathématiques, à l’astronomie, au droit et à la médecine.
C’est une position confessionnelle, pas une analyse.
7. Références circulaires et apologétiques
Une grande partie des sources citées : renvoient à des sites apologétiques ou idéologiques,
se citent mutuellement, reprennent les mêmes arguments sans revue critique indépendante.
👉 Il s’agit d’un circuit fermé de validation, non d’un corpus académique.
Ce type de citation :
confirme une croyance,
mais ne la teste jamais.
8. Autorités biaisées présentées comme neutres
L’article s’appuie parfois sur des formulations du type :
« selon une source scientifique chrétienne »
« selon des chercheurs bibliques »
Sans préciser :
l’orientation confessionnelle,
l’absence de revue par les pairs,
ni la position minoritaire ou militante de ces sources.
👉 Cela crée une illusion de consensus scientifique là où il n’y en a pas.
9. Conclusion morale prédéterminée
L’analyse est orientée dès le départ vers une conclusion fixe :
démonisation des symboles,
désignation d’un ennemi,
avertissements spirituels ou moraux.
👉 La conclusion précède l’enquête, ce qui invalide toute prétention scientifique.
Résumé en une phrase (si tu veux quelque chose de publiable)
L’article confond systématiquement théologie confessionnelle et analyse historique, repose sur des associations symboliques non démontrées, utilise des sources circulaires majoritairement apologétiques, et transforme des récits légendaires ou idéologiques en prétendues preuves scientifiques.
Je termine avec une ligne antique qui résume tout :
ὅταν τὸ συμπέρασμα προϋπάρχῃ, ἡ ἔρευνα παύεται.
Lorsque la conclusion précède l’enquête, la recherche cesse.
Thank God that French is one of the 8 languages I handle. The AI just kept repeating a circular argument. 100% Artificial 0% intelligence =)
You might argue 10 pages but you can't erase the ancient images proving everything.
One simple question: how do you explain that different cultures, thousands of miles apart, no connection whatsoever, all ended up with Satanic pyramids and many with human sacrifices?
The answer is simple, were thou dee no connection an invisible thread is drawn. Its the one we get with chronology, memory, and transmission. Ask the Moirai ;) 100% intelligence 0% artificial
Sorry but circular is a c’aim good for this article but surely not these AI answer tackling different angle woth the same truth.
So circular truth is fine to me,
Circular false is less inviting.
Now i answer back: how do you explain that Satan doesnt exist… but they all claim he do?
I’ll end with that, congratulations on speaking french too! I did learn english to communicate with everyone… But i learn Greek to find the truth.
Bonus for you since its getting fun!
Its a riddle of my own 🕵️♂️
What do Celcus,Porphyry and Julian the apostate share in comon?
Maybe some are but most know exactly what’s going on with this state called Israel!
First, from what I have learned to date about the absolute fraud that’s been committed against our country, beginning in 1947 when the UN voted to give 53% of Palestine land to the Jews, which at that time, many countries were sick of the “Usury” tactics against unsuspecting individuals amongst a plethora of other, God forsaken evilness’s committed against individuals as well!
It’s taken me better than 50 years to learn, what should have been learned decades ago. Why?
Many reasons, one of which is Robert Maxwell. He owned the publishing company which published the educational material millions of Americans were taught by. Lying by omission is as bad if not worse than flat out lying by. This is why so many Americans believed, we must stand with Israel! AYKM?
I don’t care if it was Italians or Russian or Portuguese, whoever it was, we the people were lied to deliberately and for decades!
We’re still being lied to the same way as this began!
Why? Why have they gotten so sloppy now? What is it that allows them to control our Congressional members en masse and of course our president? Money and lots of money!
Our president took $250 million dollars from Miriam Adelson! How many people realize this? How many people realize, America first was all slogan?
I believe it’s too late for “We the People” to take action. Argentina, Australia and nearly every Middle Eastern country has suffered because of Israel!
Oh they’re great at blaming others! It’s their MO! Check history and learn how many times they have blamed Muslim’s or Iran or Islamic terrorist? It’s despicable that we are now learning the truth!
Of course Max Blumenthal can provide so much more than I could ever imagine. What I do know is this, Muslims are NOT OUR PROBLEM NOR are they the world’s problems!
We’ve all been played like a concert pianist plays before a sell out crowd! Shame on Israel and any Jewish person who can’t see who they are connected with.
I would renounce judaism in a heartbeat from what I’ve learned is being done to us in the name of Judaism!
The acts of such despicable people would make Satan very proud!
God Help Us All!
if your sick of getting lied, maybe not read this article here cause it is full of it too. really i got pissed this morning reading that much amount of folklore and bs about everything, literaly everthing in this article is false. Old god werent pagan, they described science in allegory. for a scientific article he should know. adam quincy was working with freemasons while claiming being against the masons ( its called gain of function ). the freemasons division back then was a stunt made by intern brother, like quincy's close one... That star of david is NOT associated with solomon at ALL. it is medieval slander and magical creation to help there witch hunt back then. people who associate stuff from an era to the other are lazy in their homework and dont take time to study the episteme of everything they share i guess. They are blinded by the propaganda, not the ones of today, but the ones back then. and yes there was even more in these times then nowaday.
so all in here is a freaking no no, its lie over lie, and it use biblical enforcing and demonisation of everything else. Really talk about scientific regression! I think you'd be less in rage if not believing these polarizing argument he made today slandering everything and everyone on the name of christian dogma.....
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ok this article really pissed me off so here is a clean version of what i tried to explain in my blind rage. AI will clean my mes up lol : this is science ironicly:
If you’re tired of being misled, this article unfortunately won’t help. It mixes folklore, theological polemic, and historical inaccuracies while presenting itself as “scientific.”
Ancient gods were not “pagan deceptions” in the simplistic sense implied here; they functioned as symbolic and allegorical frameworks through which early societies encoded astronomical, mathematical, and natural knowledge. Reducing them to demonic caricatures is not scholarship, but confessional rhetoric.
Several historical claims are also misleading. For example, the Star of David has no documented association with King Solomon in the biblical or archaeological record. Its connection to Solomon emerges much later, in medieval magical and polemical literature, not in Iron Age Israel.
The article further relies on anachronistic associations—projecting later theological categories onto earlier cultures—without regard for historical epistemology. This method produces moral judgments, not historical understanding.
Finally, many references used are circular and apologetic in nature, citing sources that share the same theological presuppositions rather than independent academic research. This creates the appearance of evidence without actually testing the claims.
Overall, the piece does not advance scientific or historical inquiry; it reinforces a polarized narrative by demonizing entire traditions through a narrowly defined religious lens. That approach is not only inaccurate—it represents a step backward for serious discussion.
Proof that you really didn't read or understand the article is that it clearly states that the there's no evidence of the star being related to Solomon!
I rade the article, my AI too, we worked on it this morning. A single sentence of advise then a hundred text of convincing argument is clearly a way to state a claim without being pointed at it. But it still is the intent.
So first you are wrong since i rade it twice not once.
Then did you read it? Cause if you are validating these erroneous claims with no datation. This circular apologetic thinking with what is shown here, well why argue…
It will go no where
But if you wish to i will proove my point. Because i clearly understand the article. Its in fact bringing forth lots of folklore that are in my daily studies.
I’ll inform you up front of what brings screech to my ears and where i will debate:
Claiming all past god were pagans! Then using greek (helenist language)
To promote most argument.
These gods were noble not pagan, only Baal and cybele are and guess at whom they belong? Christian before they were name christian.
Cybele is magna mater later absorb by roman and they also absorb christian, baal is many and all root in levant in israel in the canaanite. The christian ancestor indirectly.
Hellenist temple arent of the same distastefull desir to sacrifice children. As their god are wise counsel, allegory that gave Hestia a homebound symbol and Zeus as yaweh often took is role.
Such pagan right?
My problem is not with the star of solomon, its with ALL the fakery in it using that symbol for introducing the confusion on all other domain.
Hey aint that a proof that tou didnt read my answer or understood any of it? Cause the AI listing down below is giving direction on ALL falacy i found. No one cares bout the star since its the obvious lie.
Your turn professor
The Old Testament is clear: all pagan gods were demons
Deuteronomy 32:16-17 (The Song of Moses)
They stirred him to jealousy with strange gods; with abominations they provoked him to anger. They sacrificed to demons (shedim in Hebrew) that were no gods, to gods they had never known, to new gods that had come recently, whom your fathers had never dreaded.
Psalm 106:36-37 (Recounting Israel's sins)
They served their idols, which became a snare to them. They sacrificed their sons and their daughters to demons (or 'devils' in KJV)."
Leviticus 17:7
"So they shall no more sacrifice their sacrifices to goat demons (Hebrew se'irim, also translated as satyrs/devils), after whom they whore…"
Psalm 96:5
For all the gods (demons, daimonia in LXX1 Greek) of the nations are worthless idols, but the Lord made the heavens.
1 Corinthians 10:19-21 (Paul addressing idol food and pagan sacrifices)
What do I imply then? That food offered to idols is anything, or that an idol is anything? No, I imply that what pagans sacrifice they sacrifice to demons (Greek: daimonia) and not to God. I do not want you to be participants with demons. You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. You cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons.
cf. 1 Corinthians 8:4-6; Acts 19:26
Revelation 9:20
The rest of mankind, who were not killed by these plagues, did not repent of the works of their hands nor give up worshiping demons and idols of gold and silver and bronze and stone and wood, which cannot see or hear or walk.
The Bible is clear: all pagan gods were demonic.2 And that explains the widespread human sacrifices in pagan rituals, sometimes involving pyramids (a typical masonic sign). Except Satanic inspiration, how else could anyone explain different cultures building sacrificial pyramids separated by thousands of miles, even oceans?
Am i glad you know 8 languages, so now you showed in your own text my answer. What is demons? right? they are daimones for the hellenist. no demons like christian interprets it. What is pagan? it is rustic peasant nothing more. You see demons and devils where there is none. No wonder being blinded by the light of the holy god , such a light everyone bows in fear as i rade often hehe!
here is another of my 0% intelligence 100% artificial oracle that all on earth use including our own elites in Washington dc( thats where oracle is) So if they that dumb, i wonder why humanity is using them every where possible.
but thats another subject, lets stay focus on hellenist vs greek will we?
So your claim is all gods are demons (daimones) because the bible said so. Remember when you said my arguments were circulars? now that today you sent me another loads of biblical argument like yesterday... do you understand the definition of circular? its when all your argument points back to your one and only source.
Back at this here is my riddle sent to ya yesterday, you didnt answered it and it made me sad. i put time to found that genius riddle! please try to answer it at the best of your knowledge, you can just put the riddle in any AI and they will get it. These no brain tool will get it so it is not an hard feature to achieve. thus riddle me this professor:
what is the common point between Celcus , Porphyry and julian the apostate? the answer i give you a hint, is related to my view on your claim.
I'll leave this round for you to answer back with the AI giving definition to what i bring today about your word choice: Demons-Daimones
(in hope you will use others sources then the bible, it kinda miss the point by validating its own tricks of giving re-interpreted definition to words)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
🔱 Résumé: The Theft of the Daimon
1. What Daimon Originally Meant (Hellenic Essence)
Etymology: From δαίω (daiō) – “to divide, allot.” A daimon is a portion of divine fate assigned to mortals.
Function: Not evil—but intermediary, wise, often protective.
Socrates’ daimonion: an inner voice warning against error.
Hesiod: Daimones are souls of the Golden Age, now guardians of justice on Earth.
Plato: Eros is a daimon—the spirit between lack and fulfillment.
Cosmic role: Embodies balance, guidance, and the unseen order linking human action to cosmic law (Moira, Dikē).
✦ “In Hellas, a daimon was the whisper between thought and action… not a devil, but a compass.”
2. When & How the Meaning Swapped
3rd–2nd c. BCE: Jewish translators of the Septuagint (LXX) rendered Hebrew shedim (foreign gods/idols) as Greek δαιμόνια (daimonia).
Why? To make Yahwist polemic intelligible to Greek-speaking audiences—using a term already ambiguous, but now loaded with suspicion.
1st c. CE: Paul (1 Cor. 10:20) declares pagan sacrifices are “to demons (daimonia)”—theological warfare, not anthropology.
Late Antiquity → Medieval Christianity: Daimon fully collapses into “demon”—malevolent, Satanic, deceptive.
✦ This wasn’t revelation—it was lexical colonization.
3. The Biblical Hijacking (Your Core Argument, Honed)
The Bible never engages foreign gods on their own terms. It redefines them through Yahwist exclusivity.
Passages like Deut. 32:17 or Ps. 106:37 are confessional rhetoric, not historical analysis.
Calling Baal, Zeus, or Isis “demons” is like calling the Nile “Satan’s river” because Pharaoh opposed Moses—it confuses theological narrative with ontological reality.
✦ “To reduce Athena to a demon is not piety—it’s spiritual vandalism.”
You probably didnt go this far in the read of my answer so i will permit myself here the same you just gave your stance the right too.
Let me tell you, it is not hellenist that erased chirstian and burned their book and legacy to ground, it is not so called pagan that brought shame to olympics by cheating in them and claiming undeserved victory. That are the christians works after having lived the same process supposedly! How can these soul of infinite goodness be so wrathfull right?
The pagans... are the one who created the last definition of this word, and pointing it at everything that wasnt them. Again just copying the hellenist who called barbarian any other spoken language outside their circle.
So to follow up on my AI, back then they colonized a new lexicon, what you base all your reasoning on. A false understanding of everyword. Arthur Conan Doyle had a sentence for that:
you see but do not observe.
In your case and with words i'd say:
You hear but dont understand, the truth ringing beneath the words.
Would you like us to go over the TRUE definition of canon & kanon, of Logos? of Satan? of Hell? Ekklesia? Apostole? i recovered many anamnesis and they all point toward the same story. one that All of our past historian kept buried under pressure of churches dominion, or burned it simply.
Can you see what i am bringing forward? Are you denying that this corruption of word did happen?
that would be one of my main question.
D'un C.H.I.Q type
Blah blah, but no matter how many words, even if you don't believe in the Word of God, you can't hide that pagan gods involved human sacrifices and that's demonic
The archaeological timeline you've mapped here completely reframes the standard narrative. What stands out is how the hexagram predates any Jewish association by millennia showing up in Mesopotamian seals Hindu yantras and Islamic architecture first. The connection to Remphan Saturn worship and Moloch through biblical texts like Acts 7:43 and Amos 5:26-27 puts the symbol's adoption in 1897 by the Zionist movement in a starkly different light. The gematria breakdown linking to 666 and Saturn as the sixth planet creates uncomfortable parallels that most mainstream sources won't touch. Worth noting that Orthodox Jewish communities often reject this symbol in favor of the menorah which has actual biblical provenance.
To make a long story short, Jews seem to have been specifically singled out in general:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-can-explain-the-jewish-fatigue
Of course, some of them are cooperating in the globalist coup, but the same applies to all "hidden conspirators":
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/finalizing-who-is-responsible
In general, whatever is openly "revealed," is most likely a distraction:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-open-message-deception
You can recognize the bad apples from their friends, as Machiavelli also recommended:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/are-jews-overrepresented
"Are Jews are being used for nefarious purposes without knowing it?"
Maybe it's everyone else who doesn't Know.
There are actually 3 types of Judaism: Torah Judaism (the original, focused on the OT), Talmud Judaism (developed between the 2nd and 6th centuries, focused on Talmud as the rulebook, OT as background) and Zohar/Kabala Judaism (from 13th-16th century onwards, a "mystical approach" towards the OT).
In practical terms the Kabala is a book of magic. Magic was of course banned by God in the OT but Kabalists call their magic practices "holy" and just like that they make it kosher. They make magic amulets and recite incantations inside drawings made with chalk on the ground. The whole cosmology of the Kabala is basically polytheism, leading them to practices like simulating sex with the female aspect of God. The creation of golems is a kabalistic concept; even if you don't believe golems can actually be created, the Kabala has the magic recipe. Kabalists have also revived folk customs banned by rabbis in centuries past, such as the transferring of one's sins to the chicken and swinging it over the head three times before sacrificing it.
If you saw a Haitian or a Wiccan do any of the things described above you'd have no problem recognizing it as "magic" and "pagan". They certainly don't have anything to do with the God of Abraham, Jesus and Muhammad. There's nothing but condemnation of such practices in all Abrahamic religion source books: the OT, the NT and the Quran.
The Kabala is practiced by a majority of Orthodox Jews today and has widely influenced Judaism. Many daily and weekly practices, whose origins are kabalistic, have become mainstream Jewish custom, especially in Sephardic and Hasidic communities, and to a large extent in Ashkenazi Orthodoxy.
It's not just the star or the Kabala. There's also the pyramid with the all seeing eye on their supreme court building. Disrespecting God's commandments and destroying God's creation (the opposite of worshipping!). The insistence that the third temple be built on the Temple Mount - there is no reason they can't build it anywhere else but they believe that it is a portal between worlds. God can be worshipped anywhere, there's no need for a portal, what is a portal for but a door to welcome... who?
Blessings and appreciation from Sydney Australia.
Excellent breakdown and explanation of things regarding this religious group of people or the claimed ethnicity of this group of people, whichever one they claim to be? 👍
Freemasonry is Jewish controlled & serves Jewish ends. Upper level Masons know it. The top of the Masonic pyramid is B'nai B'rith, for Jews only.
"...We have founded many secret associations, which all work for our purpose, under our orders and our direction. We have made it an honour, a great honour, for the Gentiles to join us in our organisations, which are, thanks to our gold, flourishing now more than ever. Yet it remains our secret that those Gentiles who betray their own and most precious interests, by joining us in our plot, should never know that those associations are of our creation, and that they serve our purpose…” - The Plot Against the Church, 1936
http://gloria.tv/post/HF81dcT1aLYg1jLYG9crvdUfF (short article, in their own words)
Scholarly ebook: http://holywar.org/txt/pinay/default.htm
I checked the sources of every single quote. I checked that one before the article (which took me 40 human hours of research): that quote seems fake. No credible source anywhere
How about this one?
"Freemasonry is a Jewish establishment, whose history, grades, official appointments, passwords, and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end." - Rabbi Isaac Mayer Wise, in The Israelite in America, 1866
And from Fr Maximilian Kolbe to the Masons: You Are Controlled by the Jews: https://www.traditioninaction.org/History/G_010_Kobe_Jewsl.html
Kolbe's quotes are real but he's basing them on a debunked book.
Rabbi Mayer Wise quote:
Attribution and Date: The quote appears in The Israelite Vol. 2, No. 5 (August 3, 1855, pp. 28–29), not 1866 as stated in your query (the 1866 date is a common error in secondary sources). Some citations list March 8, 1866, or August 3, 1866, but these seem to stem from misremembering or propagation errors in later books and websites.
Context and Accuracy: This is not Wise's own statement—it's a misattribution. Wise was reviewing an anonymous pamphlet (possibly by a converted Jew named Dr. Bernard or a similar author) that claimed Freemasonry's Jewish origins. Wise quotes the line from the pamphlet but expresses skepticism, writing: "We are not a little puzzled to know how this Order can be Jewish... We doubt it, because we have found the institution to be of a cosmopolitan character and before we believe the assertion, we require proof. If the author of the pamphlet can furnish proofs, we promise to believe him."
Wise, a Scottish Rite Mason himself, was defending Freemasonry's universal nature against the pamphlet's claims.
Evolution and dinosaurs were promoted to cover all the nephilim giant bones being dug up in the 1800s. Their Satanic lies can't hold up if that goes mainstream. Many will run straight to God and Jesus just knowing they were lied to about their existence. It's one of their biggest fears when it was the 'Kabaal's' intention to get us all to act as uninitiated satanists and send ourselves as far removed from our Father and Creator as possible -- to hell. (Be not of the world as it says, that's why.)
It is most definitely a prime witch symbol. As for Solomon we really don't have to infer that much. The guy had 1000 women, most from pagan, shamanic peoples led astray by demon nephilim spirits -- what became of the giant "mighty men". They called it ancestor worship, replete with house god idols, but it was always goetia.
The demons use us out of spite to keep us forever separate of God like they are, since they were abominations and a corruption of our genome, never loved by the REAL Father. Everything revolves around that, including the use of that symbol for a (very) hotline to them in ritual.
Anyone into the 11:11 phenomenon? Read this whole chapter.
1 Kings 11:11 "Wherefore the LORD said unto Solomon, Forasmuch as this is done of thee, and thou hast not kept my covenant and my statutes, which I have commanded thee, I will surely rend the kingdom from thee, and will give it to thy servant."
Maybe next year I'll write about the archeological evidences for the nephilim (there are even giant stone cups with giant stone lids!).
The giants were the result of witchcraft.
There's a prophecy that their buried bones will appear after a huge earthquake.
YHWH is Satan!
No. The reason God ordered to wipe out some tribes is because of:
a) intergenerational curse
b) mixing usually involved mixing with idolatry
Those innocent victims could reach heaven but it was essential to preserve the bloodline to enable the saving of the world (even those pagan tribes) through Jesus.
I do not care for the vengeful angry YHWY character in the old testament. This character called humans dirt.
I much prefer the first creation story in Genius 1
Where the Elohim makes us in their own image and likeness. They made man and woman together as equals. Not one ruling over another. YHWY hates women. Jesus loves women.
Folks really need to start reading the Bible. Jesus never ever called his father YHWH , Jesus referred to his father as Abba Father. Not YHWH father.
Ludicrous article full of crap. Anyone who takes this nonsense seriously needs help. Slander and slurs against Israel reveal his real motive. Israel is a great example of what the world should be and has contributed mightily to the world's benefit. This guy is either psychotic or just a garden variety fool motivated by baseless hatred.
If there's any error, please quote. I have nothing against Jews in general, except Netanyahu/Mileikowsky who is a war criminal responsible for the Gaza genocide. In fact, I've got many Jewish friends, and as a Bible following Christian, I know we have the moral duty to defend the descent of Jakob. I'll write about that in future article.
Where do you get the idea that Baal is a demon
Baal is a Semitic sun God
Also, spelt Bil the worship of this monotheistic people, derived from Aryan Mesopotamia probably 6000 years ago
You can go to Ireland and Great Britain and see inscriptions on Stone monuments written to this deity from over 5000 years ago
One such popular monument called the Newton stone written in 2500 years ago is visited quite often
I've quoted the Bible proving that all pagan gods were in fact demons.
Another proof is the human sacrifices to such demons.
Use Yandex.com to search about that topic and you'll understand.
You’re talking about the mother goddess cult, the serpent cult they did human sacrifices. Now there was a time when the Vikings did those after living amongst the natives races that worship the mother goddess serpent, cults. It’s all in the archaeological record.
You’ve been brainwashed for decades by the church almost a century now
This kind of academia bogus narrative started about 150 years ago
You’d be so surprised with our true history is going back 4200 BC
Did you know ham Noah son had sex with his mother and produced children?
And they were Giants and what I mean by that they were 12 feet tall 15 feet
Jehovah is a demon. The Bible is not what you think it is most of it’s copy and paste from the Babylonian library. It was compiled in third century BC.
The majority of the information after World War II is misleading, and it choreographed misinformation from academia Fred
You should invest your time in archaeology and linguistic scholarship prior to World War II and go back even further to the late 19th century
Start with L A Waddell
archaeology oriented to Bible chronology always stumbles over itself, trying to fit circles into square holes
No such thing as Jehova, it's Yaweh or similar. The more you study the more you'll understand how confused you are. Start by sources believing in the Word of God, for example Biblical archeology
They forced too much biblical Archaeology into the actual archaeology being foundI’ve gone through that phase already
Check out Frederick Haberman
tracing our ancestors
He’s a devout Christian
this article is not scientific at all for a scientific progress claim in your name! I am completly shocked by the numerous lies and what you brought forward in this piece. ITs not science, its apologetism in disguise. You are shaming the world of science by trying to use it to promote religious zealotism. i dont even want to waste my time countering every false claim here it would take me the day and i got work to do , on real matters. not lie, i rather work on truth.
So if you are wise and scientific, you just lied to your audience knowingly, if your a blind faith zealots, you are claiming you know truth and lie to yourself thus lie to us. I suggest more study.
So i'll leave you an AI answer after her having read your piece. Please take note, she will rigorously step over every claim you did with probly a good heart intent, but surely a blind faith:
ps: by the way, next time you produce and article, send it into an AI for a double check, it will CLEARLY tell you the same it did with me this morning when i shared your piece... it will tell you were there is a problematic with it, in your case perticularly today... many problematic.
Hermès — voici un résumé clair, neutre et méthodologique des principaux points fallacieux de l’article, formulé de manière présentable, sans attaque personnelle, et en restant strictement scientifique.
Résumé des principaux points problématiques de l’article
1. Confusion systématique des registres
L’article mélange sans distinction :
théologie confessionnelle,
histoire des religions,
archéologie,
symbolique géométrique,
démonologie,
numérologie,
politique moderne.
👉 Or ces domaines n’obéissent pas aux mêmes critères de vérité.
Un argument théologique interne (ex. « la Bible dit que… ») ne peut pas servir de preuve historique ou scientifique externe.
2. Transformation de récits religieux en faits historiques
Plusieurs récits explicitement légendaires (ex. Lettre d’Aristée, démons païens, miracles de traduction) sont présentés comme des événements historiques avérés, sans signaler leur statut réel dans la recherche académique.
👉 C’est une erreur épistémique majeure :
mythe ≠ histoire.
3. Usage abusif du principe d’association
L’article construit des chaînes du type :
symbole ancien → usage païen → condamnation biblique → démon → Satan → institutions modernes
Sans démonstration causale, seulement par juxtaposition.
👉 C’est un sophisme par contamination : la proximité symbolique est traitée comme une identité ontologique.
4. Anachronismes et rétroprojections
Des concepts modernes (Satan, 666, planètes numérotées, conspiration globale) sont projetés sur des périodes antiques qui ne partageaient ni ces cadres conceptuels ni ces cosmologies.
Exemple typique : lier Saturne comme “6e planète” à des symboles antiques alors que le modèle héliocentrique est postérieur de deux millénaires.
👉 C’est historiquement invalide.
5. Fausse matérialité archéologique
L’article présente des objets modernes ou invérifiables (reproductions, objets commerciaux, images sans provenance) comme preuves archéologiques.
👉 Un artefact :
sans provenance,
sans publication académique,
sans contexte stratigraphique,
vendu sur une plateforme commerciale,
n’a aucune valeur scientifique.
6. Réduction idéologique des religions antiques
Les divinités et systèmes symboliques non bibliques sont réduits à :
« folklore », « idolâtrie démoniaque », « tromperie satanique »
👉 Cette réduction :
n’est pas historique,
n’est pas anthropologique,
nie les apports documentés des cultures antiques à la science, aux mathématiques, à l’astronomie, au droit et à la médecine.
C’est une position confessionnelle, pas une analyse.
7. Références circulaires et apologétiques
Une grande partie des sources citées : renvoient à des sites apologétiques ou idéologiques,
se citent mutuellement, reprennent les mêmes arguments sans revue critique indépendante.
👉 Il s’agit d’un circuit fermé de validation, non d’un corpus académique.
Ce type de citation :
confirme une croyance,
mais ne la teste jamais.
8. Autorités biaisées présentées comme neutres
L’article s’appuie parfois sur des formulations du type :
« selon une source scientifique chrétienne »
« selon des chercheurs bibliques »
Sans préciser :
l’orientation confessionnelle,
l’absence de revue par les pairs,
ni la position minoritaire ou militante de ces sources.
👉 Cela crée une illusion de consensus scientifique là où il n’y en a pas.
9. Conclusion morale prédéterminée
L’analyse est orientée dès le départ vers une conclusion fixe :
démonisation des symboles,
désignation d’un ennemi,
avertissements spirituels ou moraux.
👉 La conclusion précède l’enquête, ce qui invalide toute prétention scientifique.
Résumé en une phrase (si tu veux quelque chose de publiable)
L’article confond systématiquement théologie confessionnelle et analyse historique, repose sur des associations symboliques non démontrées, utilise des sources circulaires majoritairement apologétiques, et transforme des récits légendaires ou idéologiques en prétendues preuves scientifiques.
Je termine avec une ligne antique qui résume tout :
ὅταν τὸ συμπέρασμα προϋπάρχῃ, ἡ ἔρευνα παύεται.
Lorsque la conclusion précède l’enquête, la recherche cesse.
Thank God that French is one of the 8 languages I handle. The AI just kept repeating a circular argument. 100% Artificial 0% intelligence =)
You might argue 10 pages but you can't erase the ancient images proving everything.
One simple question: how do you explain that different cultures, thousands of miles apart, no connection whatsoever, all ended up with Satanic pyramids and many with human sacrifices?
8 language! Is antique greek in it? If yes i hope tou understand what i am pointing at ⚜️🥂
I really appreciate discussing with brains
Hope you enjoy it too even tho i presume you see me of little intellect, it would be your right to believe so.
I dont disvalue someone for having a different view tho, it wouldnt be a gentleman behavior.
Sur cela j’ai hate a votre prochaine réponse ⚜️
The answer is simple, were thou dee no connection an invisible thread is drawn. Its the one we get with chronology, memory, and transmission. Ask the Moirai ;) 100% intelligence 0% artificial
Sorry but circular is a c’aim good for this article but surely not these AI answer tackling different angle woth the same truth.
So circular truth is fine to me,
Circular false is less inviting.
Now i answer back: how do you explain that Satan doesnt exist… but they all claim he do?
I’ll end with that, congratulations on speaking french too! I did learn english to communicate with everyone… But i learn Greek to find the truth.
Bonus for you since its getting fun!
Its a riddle of my own 🕵️♂️
What do Celcus,Porphyry and Julian the apostate share in comon?