WHO global coup: International Health Regulations
Analysis of the latest version of the amendments
A global government needs a global Constitution.
A global coup needs the appearance of a legally binding document which acts like a Constitution.
That’s why they try to use the WHO pandemic agreements to be voted at the end of May 2024, as a first step in a scissor move:
One blade of the scissor is the Pandemic Accord. They don’t call it Treaty so that people won’t realize that in order to be enforceable, it needs a Constitutional Assembly or at least Congress to approve it.
Another blade of the scissor is the modifications to the International Health Regulations, a legal scheme that was first weaponized in 2005, after SARS-CoV-1, by granting the WHO Director General, the discretionary superpower to declare an emergency, called Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), coincidentally pronounced as FAKE, since all 7 PHEICs were FAKES:
2009 H1N1 swine flu pandemic
2014 setbacks in global polio eradication efforts
2013–2016 Western African Ebola virus epidemic
2016 Zika virus outbreak
2018–19 Kivu Ebola epidemic
2019–23 COVID-19 pandemic
2022 monkeypox outbreak
Even if public opinion pressures, and both strategies become non-binding, country governments could use such “legal” instruments as the base to trigger, local emergency rules overriding the country’s Constitution and human rights, through:
a) pre-existing emergency-response laws, or
b) post-PHEIC emergency executive order/ presidential decree
giving special superpowers in case of an emergency, when defined by the WHO Director General.
That’s why all countries represented at the WorldCouncilforHealth.org (a citizen’s institution to counteract the WHO) voted unanimously to request governments to exit the WHO.
Even Donald Trump said that he wants to create a parallel institution to substitute the WHO. Also, presidential candidate, Bobby Kennedy wants to exit the WHO.
Negotiations keep happening at closed doors without the press being able to access. Fortunately, some documents have leaked. For example, the latest version available of the IHR, being analyzed here:
🚨WHO IHR Amendments - it’s NOT over 🚨
It’s right to celebrate some of the concessions made in the latest amendments, yet having read the entire document, the whole document is still predicated on two flawed assumptions:
1) The idea that naturally occurring pandemics are highly probable (and that constant, international surveillance is required)
2) That the mechanisms used to tackle Covid-19 are effective and should be deployed again.
The WHO also maintains the three crucial tools:
(1) the capacity to declare a PHEIC (Public health emergeny of international concern) on any ONE HEALTH pretext, they can imagine (eg genomic sequenced pathogen from waste water, which is an illusion of a real pathogen with pandemic potential, but not a real evidence for an effective pandemic danger). Annexes 2&3 give enormous power for the WHO to raise the alarm as they deem fit.
(2) the demand of surveillance; each country must increase its surveillance capacity within 5 years to abide by the IHR amendments- creating an inevitability that further pathogens will be ‘discovered’ and potentially deemed a public health risk.
(3) The WHO has the right to manipulate our capacity to judge by doing (1) and by making their NARRATIVE of FEAR the only accepted one (INFODEMICs being all over WHO’s and UNO‘s homepage, incl. WHO-resolution on Behavioural Sciences of May 2023).
If we add up (1), (2) and (3) the WHO can still create the illusion of a pandemic threat out of thin air, and if necessary even produce real pathogen with G-of-function.
The whole document still presents the WHO as a sole co-ordinating authority and too much power is placed in the hands of the Director General (DG), including article 48 which affords the DG rhe luxury of hand picking the ‘emergency and expert committees’. Even the review committee is selected by the DG, this is a clear conflict.
The WHO can set in motion their pandemic creation cycle at any given time, for as long as they want, and thereby direct and foster a global pandemic industry, that will make their astronomic gains and will become ever more powerful.
The following clauses also represent a significant cause for concern;
• Article 13 is a significant enabler for the pharmaceutical industrial complex and requires close attention.
• Articles 15-17, though referring to recommendations, places an undue emphasis on the centralised role of the WHO to direct and co-ordinate any pandemic or emergency response. This remains an unprecedented power grab in my eyes.
• Articles 18-34 stipulates and normalises all of the flawed methods deployed during Covid.
• Articles 35-39 and annex 6 essentially mandates documentation, including proof of vaccination, thus applies a pre-supposition that people will need to take up the offer of ‘health products’ including vaccines in order to travel etc and paves the way for vaccine mandates.
• Article 43 overemphasises the need for “health products” for access to ‘normal life’ ie vaccines
• Article 55 seems to include a waiver on the 4 month procedural rule by stipulating these will come into affect from 31/5. We need to refer to the existing clause on notice period of amendments. There is also very confusing timescales and language around reservation and rejections and the due process around this in articles 61-63
Therefore, as far as the latest version of the IHR-amendments is concerned, there are some positive concessions but these merely represent a temporary victory.
We cannot allow this document or the Pandemic Agreement to come into force and MUST keep moving forward.
Source: Telegram group: Road to Geneva Convoy 2024
This article took many hours of research to save you that many hours. If you like it, please consider a paid subscription:
or please consider “buy me a coffee”:
or you could show your love in the tip jar =)
Solutions against the global tyranny
The PLAN revealed
October 1, 2022
Laws to exit planet prison
·
May 2, 2023
Solutions for "this" Democracy?
November 14, 2022
Rethinking science
December 19, 2023
Call to action
1. Please share to save lives: sharing is caring!
10 shares = waking up more people + SAVING MORE LIVES + author’s especial gratitude!
2. If you didn’t receive this by email, please subscribe:
Scientific Progress is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subs
3. Show your love in the tip jar =)
(1 dollar makes a difference)
4. Please consider a paid subscription:
5. Please consider commissioning an article for the topic of your preference:
Most important: let’s keep praying for each other and the conversion of our enemies!
That's why it's important for people everywhere to remove themselves from water jurisdiction and return to the land and soil of their organic states/countries....then eventually the "rules" that these inbred sociopaths craft will only end up applying to a small handful; they themselves, as they should. Let them make their bs decrees and wring their little hands and police none but their own slaves!
- Stop talking about restoring "democracy"; that language belongs to the corporations. "Democracy" is the mechanism by which the parasite class has been able to use its "legal" system to commit crimes against humanity all across the world. Anyone who uses that language is helping to perpetuate the lie that has enabled the hijacking of peoples' identities.
- Legal is to democracy as Lawful is to Republic. Tasa.americanstatenationals.org.
You ought to use 'Grammarly' an AI which I use for spelling etc. "paralell?" Oops, try parallel! Otherwise excellent research discourse: https://app.grammarly.com/?utm_source=SFMC&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2023-09-21_GC-LCM-FRE-ALL-CUST-OB-PRODEDU_FreeDay0&utm_content=1X