107 = 911

Keyword: inside job

Note: 9/11 = 10/7 has nothing to do with the hilarious “Alternative math” (2+2=22) short film related to the indoctrination in schools.

“Are the Palestinian and Jewish people being played against each other by puppet masters? What are the parallels between the events of 9/11 and the Hamas attacks along the Gaza border? Are there elements of the classic Hegelian dialectic strategy — Problem/Reaction/Solution?”

To understand the context, you may consider first reading the following:

Being in favor of Israelis doesn't mean being in favor of a Zionist Israeli Government: a right of self defense never includes the “wrong” of assassinating 20 thousand innocent Gaza children. How could children be a threat !!!

Gaza was not only targeted for

a) ethnic cleansing,

b) the construction of the Ben Gurion Canal (alternative to Suez Canal) and

c) the 500 billion profitable Gaza offshore gas fields discovered two decades ago ($453 billion plus $71 billion in oil),

but for developing World War 3.

A. They Create the Original PROBLEM

• Part 1: Parallel — Previously Established and Geostrategic Goals — Coveting the Natural Resources of the Target Territory

• Part 2: Parallel — A Rich History of Historic and Recent Provocations and False Flag Operations

• Part 3: Parallel — Politically Useful Controlled Patsies

• Part 4: Parallel — A Triggering Event — An Innovative Attack with Dubious Origins; A Manufactured Invasion from Foreign Operatives

• Part 5: Parallel — A Catastrophic Intelligence Failure

• Part 6: Parallel — A Military Stand-down — with an Obvious Uncharacteristic Delay in Response

• Part 7: Parallel — Foreknowledge of the Attacks

• Part 8: Parallel — Dancing Israelis — During the Attacks

B. They Manage the Public REACTION

• Part 9: Parallel — Propaganda with Outrageous Slogans from Government and Media to Manipulate Public Emotion; Crisis Actors

• Part 10: Parallel — Atrocities Alleged to the Enemy with Ensuing Dehumanization

• Part 11: Parallel — Denial of Alleged Atrocities by the Enemy

• Part 12: Parallel — Opposition Media/Journalists Targeted

C. They Offer the Prescribed SOLUTION

• Part 13: Parallel — Military Revenge Attack Prepared in Advance with No Investigation

• Part 14: Parallel — Occupy Territory of the New Enemy — The Land Grab

• Part 15: Parallel — Widening the Conflict to Achieve Original Broader Goals

• Part 16: Parallel — Effect Regime Change of Enemy Leadership

• Part 17: Parallel — Enact “Forever War” Policy

• Part 18: Parallel — $$ Billions Flow to the Arms, Oil, Banking, and Media Industries

• Part 19: Parallel — Extreme Public Censorship by Government, MSM, and Social Media

• Part 20: Parallel — Draconian Policies and Surveillance Instituted by Government

• Part 21: Parallel — Malevolent Roots More Than 250 Years Old

Sources: 1 and 2

Twin Towers controlled demolition

German PhD Structural Engineer, Physics Professor & Explosives Expert Max Ruppert:

“I studied civil engineering at the TU Munich and went straight to the Bundeswehr University and spent four-and-a-half years on my thesis on the effects of impact and explosions on buildings. And then in September of 2000, one year before 9/11, I defended my thesis on this topic and was, I have to say in all modesty, one of the few people who ended up creating a standard to calculate such things.

And on that day (9/11), the German community — Berlin, Freiburg im Breisgau, Munich Bundeswehr University — they were all present. And we basically knew instantly, for buildings to come down that way, it can only be a planned procedure … no doubts. Not one. That didn’t happen. We instantly knew. This had to have been facilitated through a planned explosion however this was accomplished. But we instantly knew: They were brought down in a controlled manner. And we had only seen the two towers.

We also felt: “This is a really clean job! This is quite a feat! This is not easy!” ... to come up with the structural calculations to erect such a building — especially one of these dimensions — requires maybe one-hundredth of the effort and also of the technical expertise compared to what it takes to bring down such a building in this particular manner. You can always knock it down, but to do it without any great collateral damage, I mean . . .

Bringing down this type of building really means two years of the hardest work and preparation, both in terms of engineering and calculations — these days virtual, with the help of computers — as well as actual practical work on the site. Once I brought down a chimney. At the THW we were going at it with the Flex and cutting every lightning rod. The smallest disturbance could cause it to topple over.

My master of explosives, God rest his soul, who taught us these things at the THW, always said: “Guys, there is one mistake you should never make: announce beforehand how the chimney will fall. Instead, you should wait and say only afterwards: “This is where I wanted it to fall.” [Audience laughs.] You can see how difficult it is to bring these things down with such precision. This is really a profound art.

It’s all based on empirical science. So I need numbers, data, facts, which I collect diligently.

If you look at the root of the word empiria, from the Old Greek, then it is already the internalized wealth of experience. That is how it is defined. And now maybe what you meant earlier, I just have a clear question with a clear yes or no answer in this case.

You can believe me, but you don’t have to believe me, either. I don’t claim today that what I say will be accepted. But let’s be honest. Every one of you is, to a certain extent, a scientist. Yes, all of us. We do nothing other than observe things.

There are cases where demolitions took place, where it was done professionally in order to bring down such a building. There are hundreds of documented examples. That is evidence-based, I would say. That is your own observation.

There are also hundreds of examples where buildings are destroyed by fires, even large fires. And what they look like afterwards is shown in the pictures and the material — moving images or simply photographs — and that is also captured.

So, we all know, through our own observation, what is what — and can respect it that way. You don’t need me as an engineer. Thank God you don’t have to read my 350-page dissertation! That’s totally boring, anyway, just formulas and stuff. Leave it alone. Save yourself the time.

If you want to know exactly how to calculate something like that, okay, there are also updates. It was so long ago — over 20 years. But you don’t need any of that. If we just say, “When will the whole topic come to an end?” — i.e., when will we talk about the end of science as I now understand it or as I define it — then it is nothing other than making this observation myself and giving myself the time to internalize it. That is empiria.”

---

This article took many hours of research to save you that many hours. If you like it, please consider a paid subscription:

or please consider “buy me a coffee”:

or you could show your love in the tip jar =)

---

Solutions against the global tyranny

The PLAN revealed

October 1, 2022

This research took many many hours (including late night work), that will save you that amount of reading and organizing ideas. If you like it, please consider a paid subscription: or please consider “buy me a coffee” (one dollar makes a difference):

Read full story

Laws to exit planet prison

Prof. Fred Nazar

·

May 2, 2023

To understand why these laws are needed, please read this first: 16 ideas for brainstorming (please comment with your corrections and suggestions): Global moratorium against Gain-of-Function First read this first: Ban all level 3 and 4 labs (3000+) to immediately destroy any research with dangerous pathogens

Read full story

---

Solutions for "this" Democracy?

November 14, 2022

Please read first: How about REAL democracy: townhall republican democracy? Even if you’d be elected president today, you wouldn’t be able to whatever you want, considering the budget is fixed by Congress, that impeachment for breaking any law is a Damocles sword, and that all your decisions should be signed by cabinet members.

Read full story

Rethinking science

December 19, 2023

Unless we change it, we’re doomed to the next PLANdemic. And yet, nothing has changed, only got worse! This isn’t pessimism: just a realistic call to ACTION in the medical and scientific freedom communities. This is a chapter from the book about practical solutions to the global coup.

Read full story

---

Call to action

1. Please share to save lives: sharing is caring!

10 shares = waking up more people + SAVING MORE LIVES + author’s especial gratitude!

2. If you didn’t receive this by email, please subscribe:

Scientific Progress is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subs

3. Show your love in the tip jar =)
(1 dollar makes a difference)

4. Please consider a paid subscription:

5. Please consider commissioning an article for the topic of your preference:

Most important: let’s keep praying for each other and the conversion of our enemies!