Bio-BOMB, not “vaccine”, not “gene-therapy”
This 5th gen war, includes a war on semantics.
This author suggested in April 2020 that the best term to name mRNA and viral vector injections is “haccine”, because they hack the cell to produce the spike protein non-stop until the cell dies of old (apoptosis) or exhaustion.
It turned out that haccines, not only elicit an immune response to the s-proteins expelled by the hacked cells, but also an auto-immune response against that type of cells, as they were foreign organisms.
David E. Martin discovered that the patent office rejected twice, the applications for mRNA vaccines, because they didn't comply with the definition of vaccine, which was finally changed to accommodate Pfizer and approve them as “vaccines”.
The first definition of gene therapy involved only DNA changing. Later, it was widened to include changing the cell purpose, for example through mRNA.1
In July 2018 (until present, 2023) the FDA defined: “Human gene therapy seeks to modify or manipulate the expression of a gene or to alter the biological properties of living cells for therapeutic use.” 2
FDA, EMA, Pfizer and Moderna SEC filings classify mRNA vaccines as “gene therapy”.3
Yet, fact checkers denied that COVID vaccines were gene therapies.4 Later, a Swedish paper proved they also change DNA, not only RNA. So they comply with both definitions of gene therapy.
Therapy, means healing. COVID injections don’t heal, they can’t be classified as therapeutic, even if the manufacturers claim a preventive purpose.
COVID injections produced the spike protein, which was designed from scratch to infertilize, handicap and murder the population, not only through injection but also through shedding.
It's clear that the spike was engineered because:
a) it was patented in over 90% years before the pandemic as David E. Martin proved
b) it contains genetic sequences of HIV and a Moderna cancer sequence, which is impossible naturally
c) RGD motif:
d) how dominant media and freemason agents acted in the COVID play:
COVID haccines didn't use the cell just to produce the spike proteins but also for other hidden purposes. This is proven by erasing the other traces, presenting health authorities only edited images instead of the complete lab results:
Everyone is clueless about which instructions are inserted, just as a gullible computer user is clueless of what the Trojan he just allowed to be installed did. With variants, they might be producing even more injuring spikes, that take longer to show the primary intended lethal effects. They shouldn’t be called secondary adverse events.
The longer they take to appear, the harder to detect correlation and prove causation. If everyone died the minute they took the jab, then nobody would take them. The trick is to retard the fuse as much as possible and to keep the more lethal effects to a smaller sample. That’s why 5% of the vials could explain over 90% of deaths… the criminal intent is proven by the specific labelling of the kill-vials by the manufacturers (howbad.info).
This stunning video shows how advanced is biotech to have edited such a complex structure:
Coincidence? The same day this was published, the Vimeo link to that video was erased. Why? Because it showed something we are not supposed to see? Hiding an origins mistake? Fortunately, they forgot to erase this:
The main purpose of censoring the lab origin and release of COVID was to prevent people from associating the spike protein with the idea of a bioweapon (as well as the connection to Wuhan’s gain-of-function funding by the French and US freemason deep state).
COVID injections, are not vaccines, not haccines, not gene therapies, just bio-bombs in this 5th generation war we are in, even if there was no official declaration of war-on-mankind by satanists/freemasons:
3 Moderna's annual reports state that US and EU agencies classify mRNA as gene therapy:
2020 annual report, pp 106, 107, 116: https://www.annreports.com/moderna/moderna-ar-2020.pdf
2021 annual report (referred to as "10-K"), pp 63, 65: https://www.annreports.com/moderna/moderna-ar-2021.pdf
FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), second set of bullet points with categorizations:
A 32-page document, apparently submitted to an FDA meeting by two researchers, discusses the term at length:
A "vaccine" press release posing as an informational article, from the American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy (ASGCT):