Hi I'm confused about a few things and if you have references:
1. Even if lab creation of Sars-C-2, do you have a paper showing purification and characterization of a virus that is directly Sanger sequenced (not new generation metagenomics), and not just an EM photo, supernatant, or cell culture.
2. What is the mechanism of making Spike proteins that you note? If mRNA, is there a study showing purification of mRNA that makes Spike and a dose-response study of mRNA to Spike regardless of being linear or variable?
2. I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are aiming at with the question. There is no dosage: nobody knows how much s-protein a person makes because it depends on many factors (injection dose, place of injection, dissemination, personal immune response, etc.).
I am aiming at clarifying, 1. Has a sars-c-2 virus been found by purification and characterization? Not by in-silico hypothetical genome making or cell culture without the purification etc. 2. Has mRNA in the shots been purified and proven to be there, and does it make spike protein?
Analysis of your reply:
1. In the paper you link, the section on Virus Exist doesn't have a paper showing purified sars. The paper wants to say the the virus must have been isolated otherwise it wouldn't be possible to prove ivermectin worked, but that is not true. If it did work on something, it doesnt mean it is sarc-c-2, could be any causation.
On finding sars-C-2 this paper listed in the link you give for example
talks about RNA taken from a patient-meaning a mix of a zillion types and fragments of RNA, NOT FROM A VIRUS. Then given a pcr that was made from hypothetical genome from the prior study eg Fan Wu. The pcr doesnt test for a virus, it was only made from theoretical genome printed from a computer as was all the phylogony graphs.
2. To prove there is mRNA in the vaxes, mRNA needs to be purified from a vax sample, you don't need cells or persons. There is no such study. Then you need some dose-response curve (just as you say above "dose") of spike being made at least to some degree in-vitro cell culture, though there should be some dose-response to even make this as a product. The "how much" is secondary to at least being made or not. And place of injection or dissemination, or immune response doesn't have anything to do with finding spike being made or not in a cell culture.
So far, no sars, mRNA has been proven to come from these vaxes, and no spike has been proven to be made in a cell culture (or in a person) injected with these vaxes. If you think I'm wrong pls send an exact paper showing this, please not the 348 page review paper that doesn't itself have the methods. Thank you for your efforts.
there is no purified RNA from a sample anywhere. I understand that the mRNA that they've made for the jabs is synthetic and has some uridines added. I don't know if they have published papers showing that the mRNA is translated in vitro into the chosen amino acid sequence which has a molecular weight of 180-200 (aka the spike). certainly in vivo it's impossible to tell if any proteins detected were already there in the body, caused by other things in the jab or translated from the mRNA.
I was going to say, half jokingly, that Malone would be the person to ask. And indeed when searching for proteins produced by synthetic mRNA his name is third after Fauci's 2020 paper on vaccine technologies. this from 1989 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC297778/pdf/pnas00283-0074.pdf Malone et al show a dose dependent production of luciferase from adding mRNA designed from the luciferase 'gene' template to cells, although there was toxicity caused by the liposome used and the mRNA was used soon after making it so no indication of how well it can be stored. They conclude it can be used as a drug to make cells produce what humans think they should be producing; the most utter nonsense and hubris ever.
I have thought since the beginning that 'covid' was an exercise in normalising mRNA injection and gene therapy in general; which up until 2020 was (quite rightly) regarded with horror. mRNA can be 'used' (not that it helps) for all sorts of diseases https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34668716/ I don't think it's a genocide I think it's an experiment.
surely they could have of found a more useful and perhaps less obvious study group than two thirds of the worlds population..
however.. it may be that they have used these numbers because they are looking for something in three billion or six billion... and they don't have the time to fuck about...
whatever 'it' is..they sure want you to have 'it'... and seem to have been collecting the 'Worlds' DNA for a while...
A fucking opinion piece is not a credible source. Get the fuck out of here with that nonsense. Approach me as an honest broker or stay the fuck away, please.
I don’t do disingenuous bullshit, phules, or intentionally disingenuous agitprop assholes.
Ball and Chain prevents crime, but it's not a treatment. In most cases, preventatives act by reducing healthiness, not increasing it, in the hope that reduced healthiness will prevent disease.
I am calling it jabocide. I think that covers it.
GREATEST CRIME IN WORLD HISTORY
Hi I'm confused about a few things and if you have references:
1. Even if lab creation of Sars-C-2, do you have a paper showing purification and characterization of a virus that is directly Sanger sequenced (not new generation metagenomics), and not just an EM photo, supernatant, or cell culture.
2. What is the mechanism of making Spike proteins that you note? If mRNA, is there a study showing purification of mRNA that makes Spike and a dose-response study of mRNA to Spike regardless of being linear or variable?
Thank you in advance
Thank you for your smart questions.
1. Section "virus exist" http://bit.ly/research2000
2. I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are aiming at with the question. There is no dosage: nobody knows how much s-protein a person makes because it depends on many factors (injection dose, place of injection, dissemination, personal immune response, etc.).
I am aiming at clarifying, 1. Has a sars-c-2 virus been found by purification and characterization? Not by in-silico hypothetical genome making or cell culture without the purification etc. 2. Has mRNA in the shots been purified and proven to be there, and does it make spike protein?
Analysis of your reply:
1. In the paper you link, the section on Virus Exist doesn't have a paper showing purified sars. The paper wants to say the the virus must have been isolated otherwise it wouldn't be possible to prove ivermectin worked, but that is not true. If it did work on something, it doesnt mean it is sarc-c-2, could be any causation.
On finding sars-C-2 this paper listed in the link you give for example
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017
talks about RNA taken from a patient-meaning a mix of a zillion types and fragments of RNA, NOT FROM A VIRUS. Then given a pcr that was made from hypothetical genome from the prior study eg Fan Wu. The pcr doesnt test for a virus, it was only made from theoretical genome printed from a computer as was all the phylogony graphs.
2. To prove there is mRNA in the vaxes, mRNA needs to be purified from a vax sample, you don't need cells or persons. There is no such study. Then you need some dose-response curve (just as you say above "dose") of spike being made at least to some degree in-vitro cell culture, though there should be some dose-response to even make this as a product. The "how much" is secondary to at least being made or not. And place of injection or dissemination, or immune response doesn't have anything to do with finding spike being made or not in a cell culture.
So far, no sars, mRNA has been proven to come from these vaxes, and no spike has been proven to be made in a cell culture (or in a person) injected with these vaxes. If you think I'm wrong pls send an exact paper showing this, please not the 348 page review paper that doesn't itself have the methods. Thank you for your efforts.
there is no purified RNA from a sample anywhere. I understand that the mRNA that they've made for the jabs is synthetic and has some uridines added. I don't know if they have published papers showing that the mRNA is translated in vitro into the chosen amino acid sequence which has a molecular weight of 180-200 (aka the spike). certainly in vivo it's impossible to tell if any proteins detected were already there in the body, caused by other things in the jab or translated from the mRNA.
I was going to say, half jokingly, that Malone would be the person to ask. And indeed when searching for proteins produced by synthetic mRNA his name is third after Fauci's 2020 paper on vaccine technologies. this from 1989 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC297778/pdf/pnas00283-0074.pdf Malone et al show a dose dependent production of luciferase from adding mRNA designed from the luciferase 'gene' template to cells, although there was toxicity caused by the liposome used and the mRNA was used soon after making it so no indication of how well it can be stored. They conclude it can be used as a drug to make cells produce what humans think they should be producing; the most utter nonsense and hubris ever.
I have thought since the beginning that 'covid' was an exercise in normalising mRNA injection and gene therapy in general; which up until 2020 was (quite rightly) regarded with horror. mRNA can be 'used' (not that it helps) for all sorts of diseases https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34668716/ I don't think it's a genocide I think it's an experiment.
surely they could have of found a more useful and perhaps less obvious study group than two thirds of the worlds population..
however.. it may be that they have used these numbers because they are looking for something in three billion or six billion... and they don't have the time to fuck about...
whatever 'it' is..they sure want you to have 'it'... and seem to have been collecting the 'Worlds' DNA for a while...
Lies. Agitprop lies. GTFO
https://rumble.com/v24xmw6-c19-vaccine-bioweapon-genocide.html
A fucking opinion piece is not a credible source. Get the fuck out of here with that nonsense. Approach me as an honest broker or stay the fuck away, please.
I don’t do disingenuous bullshit, phules, or intentionally disingenuous agitprop assholes.
Interesting, do you consider 2000 scientific references, involving at least 20 thousand scientists and physicians, just "an opinion"?:
http://bit.ly/research2000
After your first claim, you have lost all credibility whatsoever.
Yes, because your sources are bogus and not credible. Give it up.
So you are claiming that 20 thousand scientists and physicians at risk of losing their jobs for telling the truth, are lying for the sake of...
No. I’m saying you are a liar go away.
Could we simply pronounce it as Whacksin?
Ball and Chain prevents crime, but it's not a treatment. In most cases, preventatives act by reducing healthiness, not increasing it, in the hope that reduced healthiness will prevent disease.
Yes. https://open.substack.com/pub/thaddeuskozinski/p/the-death-of-truth?utm_source=direct&r=24l7o&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
There is no covid, there is no covid, there is no covid! https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/there-is-no-covid