SATattack
Are they micro-frying us? Worse!
Summary
In simple terms, from satellites, they are:
1. Slo-killing us with microwaves (like microwave oven but with less power).
2. Changing the weather (and blaming it on carbon).
3. Energizing (ionizing) the atmosphere to a) power the graphene Bluetooth nano-routers massively injected b) enhance surveillance capabilities, and c) support a chemtrail grid from falling too fast (together with 15 min pulses from 5G cell towers and drones).
4. Other objectives we can't prove yet, but there are theories of a Sky Beam program projecting holograms to a) simulate a UFO invasion, b) "prove" an anti Christ is a messiah/god.
Cheap countermeasures below.
Prove it with your Android phone
Anyone can install for free the ElectroSmart app from Google PlayStore, and start measuring at different times at day or night. For instance, check this reading on 2022:
Screenshots from the author’s Android phone.
According to ElectroSmart, allegedly the most accurate app, out of the 63 sources, only three 4G antennas were from cell towers, the other 60 were in fact satellite emitters, where 31, classified by ElectroSmart as 3G, showed lethal levels of microwave radiation. They are “frying” us in installments. Proof: 4G cell tower antennas didn’t show dangerous levels (though ElectroSmart isn’t considering the dangerous accumulative effect).
Starlink dishes require a huge amount of power in the incoming signal because they are completely different from regular satellite dishes like DirecTV. 1 Current Starlink microwaves reach injuring levels. With less emitters, something similar was detected for EutelSAT and other passing by, by matching the increase in emitters with apps like “Find my satellite”.
In 2023, ”Folding out from the main body of the much larger V2 Starlink satellite, the cellular (satellite) antennas will be “roughly 25 square meters.” 2 It’s unlikely that those huge antennas won’t propel a health pandemic.
Weaponized satellites
T-Mobile connectivity of cell phones with Starlink/SpaceX proves that at lower orbital shells (340 and 550 km), phones don’t even need any special hardware (like Apple’s redesigned internal antenna).
How much power does an iPhone 14 uses to reach a Globalstar satellite at a height of 1414 km (876 miles) with microwave beams? 3 Hint: that same power is being used to fry us from our phones as checked with Quanta Monitor app.
A low orbit satellite grid is ideal for surveillance, for picking up signals from hacked regular cellphones4 or for different forms of attacks. Think what they are already doing with Google’s Earth Engine: “petabytes of remote sensing datasets:
40 years of Landsat data
Copernicus Sentinel 1 and 2 data
MODIS: twice daily global coverage, 36 bands
Topography (elevation, land cover)
Timelapse
Climate data (ideal to confirm their geoengineering results or failures)
Disease risk mapping (like UCSF Global Health Group Malaria Elimination Initiative)
Crop yield estimation by crop type
Machine learning” 5
If that is for the masses, thing about military uses.
Directed-energy weapon (DEW): 6
Lethal/injuring microwaves, as detected above
Energize the atmosphere
Support a chemtrailed layer/mesh/grid from falling faster.
Disrupt ground or sat communications.
Take down aircraft, devices and targets on earth.
Take down internet sats for the Global Hack (in order to launch the new fully censored internet).
Also, disrupting the magnetosphere/ionosphere at 100 km height could cause “Space Weather effects, such as:
Damage to the electrical power grids, like the loss of power for the entire province of Quebec caused by a large geomagnetic storm in March, 1989.
Loss of radio communications
Damage to telecommunications satellites
Degradation of satellite navigation (e.g. GPS) accuracy
Radiation from space causing flights to be diverted
Pipeline corrosion” 7
They are preparing unhackable anti-sabotage “space-based laser communications” “to form the backbone for mega satellite constellations”. 8
Their dream-ware is our nightmare!
Sat climate change
For deliberate droughting, satellites create a microwave barrier to destroy cloud formation or dissolve clouds.
Satellite imagery show some that satellite trajectory exactly match a convex front in cloud dissipation, e.g. in northern Spain where the clouds from the Atlantic hit the continent.
The climate attacks are coordinated with ground stations: there are no such things as natural straight-angle or radial clouds:
It’s hard to believe it’s a coincidence that the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction’s 2021 Global Assessment Report called the worldwide drought “the next pandemic”9, concluding that number and duration of droughts increased 29% between 2000 and 2022 in a feedback loop, especially in agricultural or subtropical dry lands like Australia and Southern Africa.10
IMPORTANT NOTE: the above weather images and 3 countermeasures below, were generously supplied by engineer Diego Barrientos, who has the most updated tech information in the world, about the digi-tatorship being built. Watch his YouTube channel is CEVICAS (in Spanish), as if your life depended on it, literally.
Countermeasures
1. Grounded footwear, with electrical grounding soles like conductive leathers, vegetable fibres (jute, sisal, hemp, flax, bamboo, banana, etc.11), ESD or anti static footwear 12, except in risk of electric shock, where soles should provide electrical insulation, like rubber.
2. Use EMF-insulating clothes and hat (aluminium foil inside your cap)
3. Turn your place into a grounded Faraday cage (special paint, rugs, metallic mosquito nets, etc.).
4. Hacking
There’s a Hack-A-Sat US Air Force competition. 13 “Jamming satellite communications, spoofing false timing signals, dazzling or blinding on-board observation instrumentation, and cyberattacks are continuing threats. Often, it can be difficult to identify whether a system failure is due to debris collision, an inherent failure, or nefarious activity.”
5. Anti-satellite weapons
Few nations have defence systems, passing kinetic ASAT anti-satellite testing: Russia, China, USA, India. 14
Why? They are hard to shoot down. LEO satellites move at around 7.8 km/s velocity relative to a fixed point on the Earth. Satellites’ orbital period is 90–110 min (4°/min), implying a hypersonic speed of Mach 22, 27000 km/h / 17500 mph) 15 which is 10x faster than a bullet (3000 kph / 1800 mph) 16.
China sees Starlink as a military threat
“Starlink satellites have enabled Ukrainian forces to monitor and coordinate drones, enabling soldiers to fire anti-tank weapons with great precision as well as spot targets for artillery strikes. The system was reportedly instrumental in the sinking of the Russian cruiser Moskva, providing targeting data for Ukrainian shore-based missile batteries.
US drones and stealth fighters would have their data connection speeds increased by 100 times if connected to the Starlink network.
Military payloads could be launched alongside Starlink satellites, which would require China to upgrade its existing space surveillance systems to take super high-resolution photos to identify any unusual features on the satellites.
Starlink satellites could be turned into ad-hoc anti-satellite weapons to take out China’s own space-based military assets.
China may opt to take out GPS to cripple US and Taiwanese navigation and precision strike capabilities during an invasion. In such a case, however, Starlink timing signals could be used as a substitute for GPS and to pinpoint any location on Earth to an accuracy of eight meters, providing a feasible backup to the decades-old satellite system.
Starlink could also be used as an early warning system against China’s ballistic missiles and hypersonic weapons. In October 2020, the US Space Development Agency (SDA) signed a US$149 million contract with SpaceX to develop four missile-tracking satellites equipped with powerful infrared sensors based on its Starlink design.
The Starlink constellation is a decentralized system which needs to be taken down as a whole through hacking. It’s not cost-effective to destroy them one by one, using:
Relativistic Klystron Amplifier (RKA), a satellite mounted ultra-high-powered microwave.
X-ray laser technology
Kinetic hunter-killer satellites
Interceptor missiles
Ground-based high-power lasers”
Footnotes
2 https://spaceexplored.com/2022/08/25/starlink-direct-cell-phone-connection/
https://9to5mac.com/2022/09/18/iphone-14-satellite-connectivity-qualcomm/
4 Satellite connectivity was already possible with iphones at least since 24 Set 2021 (launch date of iPhone 13), T-Mobile low orbit connectivity proves it could have been earlier and could have been used to uplink hacked data.
https://www.androidauthority.com/android-14-satellite-support-3204024/
Boosted by a hidden mesh which works as a “sleeve” maybe including 5G? https://www.thuraya.com/products-list
6 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon
27 Dec 2020 Secretary of Defense Mark Esper has confirmed China + Russia possess and are using directed energy weapons (DEW) in space https://www.bitchute.com/video/JHCM384t9nNX/
7 https://superdarn.ca/importance
8 https://intelligence.weforum.org/topics/a1Gb0000000pTDUEA2/key-issues/a1Gb00000015QBMEA2
9 https://www.undrr.org/publication/gar-special-report-drought-2021
10 Schumacher, D.L., Keune, J., Dirmeyer, P. et al. Drought self-propagation in drylands due to land–atmosphere feedbacks. Nat. Geosci. 15, 262–268 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00912-7
11 https://textilelearner.net/vegetable-fibers-types-properties/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03670074.1943.11664330?journalCode=teaf19
12 https://safetymk.com/the-difference-between-esd-and-anti-static-safety-shoes-safety-shoes-knowledge/
Pavur J, Strohmeier M, et al. Security and privacy issues of Satellite Communication in the Aviation Domain. 2022 14th International Conference on Cyber Conflict. Keep Moving T. Jančárková, G. Visky, I. Winther (Eds.)
https://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/files/13686/CyCon_2022_baselt.pdf https://ccdcoe.org/library/publications/cycon-2022-book/
Pavur J, Moser D, et al. 2019. Secrets in the sky: on privacy and infrastructure security in DVB-S satellite broadband. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks (WiSec ‘19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 277-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3317549.3323418
Burger, E., Pavur, J., and Van Laan, M., comments at the FCC, in re: Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and Other Telecommunications Services, WC Docket No. 16-106, at http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=60001974396
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10705641704886
14 https://intelligence.weforum.org/topics/a1Gb0000000pTDUEA2/key-issues/a1Gb0000002KWrMEAW
15 Cakaj, Shkelzen, The Parameters Comparison of the “Starlink” LEO Satellites Constellation for Different Orbital Shells. 7 May 2021. Frontiers in Communications and Networks. Vol 2, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3389/frcmn.2021.643095
What we need is a God driven massive solar flare to erase all this evil nonsense.
One of the best articles on Substack!