thank you so much. I was noticing your comments in Bonnie and John's live stream tonight and would love to correspond with you. I've written a book called "The Dark Side of Prenatal Ultrasound" that lays out the facts about this weaponry and how babies are being targeted for destruction. This is why we have so many autistic children. Here's a link: https://birthofanewearth.com/2019/04/the-dark-side-of-prenatal-ultrasound/ I think you will find the book super interesting and I would love to collaborate with you, Bonnie and John on all this research.
Ultrasound causes harm to the unborn baby in the first trimester. Ultrasound causes harmful effects on tissue. 1 Biological effects of ultrasound are dose-dependent.
Pulsed Doppler ultrasound should be used with extreme caution, especially the first weeks, when the baby is forming rapidly, according to the ALARA principle. 2 “First trimester ultrasound is associated with negligible rise in the thermal index. Increased acoustic output levels, as expressed by TI levels, are reached while performing obstetrical Doppler studies: may reach above 1.5 (a known hazard). The mechanical index (MI) indicates the potential for the ultrasound to induce inertial cavitation in tissues.” 3: “the creation of gas bubbles (cavitation) during ultrasound exposure is more likely to occur at lower rather than higher frequencies. Upon collapsing, such bubbles can induce haemorrhage (by the rupture of cells or tissues). Thus, acoustic inertial cavitation secondary to a 220-kHz MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) surgery is a serious safety issue… 220-kHz ultrasound is capable of inducing a thermal lesion in the brain of living swines without hemorrhage. Although the same acoustic energy can induce either a hemorrhage or a thermal lesion…” 4 High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU or MRgFUS) serves for surgery (ablation) 5
Ultrasound causes brain damage even to the point of autism: “exposure to first trimester ultrasound had significantly decreased non-verbal IQ and increased repetitive behaviors relative to male children with ASD”. 6
“The neurons that form the brain are being developed, and they form in one area of the central nervous system and then have to travel to other places: mouse models suggest that, if you heat up the tissue and put pressure on it (while this is happening), they may end up in the wrong place… prolonged sound waves are causing atypical cell division and migration.” 7 FDA approved ultrasound for bone fractures because it increases cell division.” 8
“An Australian study on 1400 pregnant women showed that those who had 5 monthly ultrasound tests, as compared to women who only had one, gave birth lower weight babies, mostly left handed. Canadian Medical Association’s Journal showed that in a study of 72 children with delayed speech disorder, more than 70% of the children were exposed to frequent ultrasounds during pregnancy. A study from Switzerland showed that mice who were exposed to extreme amounts of ultrasound during pregnancy birth mice that acted abnormally, not as explorative as the control group. Once matured they had difficulty in learning patterns, it took them more repetitions of simple tasks to learn that the task was always rewarded.” 9
WHO: “the mean length of infants exposed to Doppler was 0.26 cm shorter… lower intellectual performance scores and an increased risk of subnormal performance… There was a statistically significant association between a higher number of ultrasound exposures (3 + vs. 1) and low birth weight (OR 1.27; 95% CI, 1.02–1.58). Mean length and head circumference… a weak association between exposure to ultrasonography and non-right handedness in boys” (hint for early brain damage). 10 65 studies mean a huge red alert. 11
Side note: ultrasound gel is toxic (especially, if colored blue): no studies found about crossing the belly skin but they are abortifacient in trans-vaginal sonograms. Any substance would work that does not form bubbles/interference, e.g. coconut oil.
Thank you for sharing. I never knew this. I don't know if they did ultrasound on the unborn babies back in 1976 when I was pregnant. It was never suggested.
Of course, it's been a weapon from its inception. It was used in naval warfare in the early days to detect submarines. They knew 100 years ago how damaging this energy is. Here's an excerpt from my book:
100 years ago (1927), researchers Robert Wood and Alfred Lee Loomis noted the harmful effects of ultrasound and concluded that ultrasound “could be just as injurious [to the human body] as x‑rays and atomic radiation.”
High doses of ultrasonic energy…is as injurious [to the human body] as atomic radiation. The effects…normally are irreversible.
Likewise, a study published in 1949 found that ultrasound damage was similar to that caused by x-rays and mustard gas.
The immediate effects of ultrasonic vibrations upon the nuclei and chromosomes of living plant cells show marked visible resemblances to the primary and secondary effects produced by electromagnetic radiations such as x-ray… and also to those produced by mustard gas.
In a 1966 article, researcher Mikio Kato demonstrated that ultrasound may be even more likely to cause mutations than x‑rays.
Ultrasonic vibration would be a better proximate cause of mutation than X-ray irradiation.
In an article published in 1979, ultrasound researchers working with mice observed ultrasonically-induced fetal malformations and brain defects similar to those previously associated with x-rays.
Brain defects were produced at all stages of gestation but tended to involve the forebrain more at earlier times. Defects such as fusions of the ribs or vertebrae, spina bifida, and limb reductions were produced... The types of malformation produced by ultrasound thus appear to follow the same pattern of change with gestational age as do those produced by X-ray irradiation.
A rat study published in 1986 concluded that ultrasound caused brain defects similar to those triggered by x-rays and extreme heating.
It is clear that the stage of gestation at the time of ultrasound exposure influences the types of malformations that are produced and the organ systems which are affected… Malformations of the heart and great vessels were primarily associated with exposures at 9 [days gestation]. Fusion defects of the vertebral column and limb defects progressively increased in frequency with exposures later in gestation… Brain defects were produced by exposure at all stages although incidence was less at 12 [days gestation]… It appears that the pattern of sensitivity with gestational age for malformation production by ultrasound is similar to that reported for ionizing radiation and for thermal insult.”
In 2012, it was determined that rat fetuses exposed to ultrasound suffered from “bioeffects similar to X-ray exposure.” Researchers found “substantial alterations in gene expression” including those “implicated in important developmental signaling pathways.” The researchers concluded that ultrasound “could probably affect expression of highly important genes implicated in embryonic development” and “should be used with caution, particularly in early pregnancy.”
Great. The book actually ended up with over 1800 citations. There is so much damage being done, it is hard to keep track of it all. Infertility and sterility are also a result of this radiation exposure.
the video has been deleted. Do you have it posted somewhere else?
The first link:
https://rumble.com/v24xmw6-c19-vaccine-bioweapon-genocide.html
thank you so much. I was noticing your comments in Bonnie and John's live stream tonight and would love to correspond with you. I've written a book called "The Dark Side of Prenatal Ultrasound" that lays out the facts about this weaponry and how babies are being targeted for destruction. This is why we have so many autistic children. Here's a link: https://birthofanewearth.com/2019/04/the-dark-side-of-prenatal-ultrasound/ I think you will find the book super interesting and I would love to collaborate with you, Bonnie and John on all this research.
Ultrasound harms the preborn
Ultrasound causes harm to the unborn baby in the first trimester. Ultrasound causes harmful effects on tissue. 1 Biological effects of ultrasound are dose-dependent.
Pulsed Doppler ultrasound should be used with extreme caution, especially the first weeks, when the baby is forming rapidly, according to the ALARA principle. 2 “First trimester ultrasound is associated with negligible rise in the thermal index. Increased acoustic output levels, as expressed by TI levels, are reached while performing obstetrical Doppler studies: may reach above 1.5 (a known hazard). The mechanical index (MI) indicates the potential for the ultrasound to induce inertial cavitation in tissues.” 3: “the creation of gas bubbles (cavitation) during ultrasound exposure is more likely to occur at lower rather than higher frequencies. Upon collapsing, such bubbles can induce haemorrhage (by the rupture of cells or tissues). Thus, acoustic inertial cavitation secondary to a 220-kHz MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) surgery is a serious safety issue… 220-kHz ultrasound is capable of inducing a thermal lesion in the brain of living swines without hemorrhage. Although the same acoustic energy can induce either a hemorrhage or a thermal lesion…” 4 High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU or MRgFUS) serves for surgery (ablation) 5
Ultrasound causes brain damage even to the point of autism: “exposure to first trimester ultrasound had significantly decreased non-verbal IQ and increased repetitive behaviors relative to male children with ASD”. 6
“The neurons that form the brain are being developed, and they form in one area of the central nervous system and then have to travel to other places: mouse models suggest that, if you heat up the tissue and put pressure on it (while this is happening), they may end up in the wrong place… prolonged sound waves are causing atypical cell division and migration.” 7 FDA approved ultrasound for bone fractures because it increases cell division.” 8
“An Australian study on 1400 pregnant women showed that those who had 5 monthly ultrasound tests, as compared to women who only had one, gave birth lower weight babies, mostly left handed. Canadian Medical Association’s Journal showed that in a study of 72 children with delayed speech disorder, more than 70% of the children were exposed to frequent ultrasounds during pregnancy. A study from Switzerland showed that mice who were exposed to extreme amounts of ultrasound during pregnancy birth mice that acted abnormally, not as explorative as the control group. Once matured they had difficulty in learning patterns, it took them more repetitions of simple tasks to learn that the task was always rewarded.” 9
WHO: “the mean length of infants exposed to Doppler was 0.26 cm shorter… lower intellectual performance scores and an increased risk of subnormal performance… There was a statistically significant association between a higher number of ultrasound exposures (3 + vs. 1) and low birth weight (OR 1.27; 95% CI, 1.02–1.58). Mean length and head circumference… a weak association between exposure to ultrasonography and non-right handedness in boys” (hint for early brain damage). 10 65 studies mean a huge red alert. 11
Side note: ultrasound gel is toxic (especially, if colored blue): no studies found about crossing the belly skin but they are abortifacient in trans-vaginal sonograms. Any substance would work that does not form bubbles/interference, e.g. coconut oil.
Thank you for sharing. I never knew this. I don't know if they did ultrasound on the unborn babies back in 1976 when I was pregnant. It was never suggested.
YES!!! To all of it! And much more besides. Have you also written a book on this topic?
No. Just this subchapter about the weaponization of ultrasound
Of course, it's been a weapon from its inception. It was used in naval warfare in the early days to detect submarines. They knew 100 years ago how damaging this energy is. Here's an excerpt from my book:
100 years ago (1927), researchers Robert Wood and Alfred Lee Loomis noted the harmful effects of ultrasound and concluded that ultrasound “could be just as injurious [to the human body] as x‑rays and atomic radiation.”
High doses of ultrasonic energy…is as injurious [to the human body] as atomic radiation. The effects…normally are irreversible.
Likewise, a study published in 1949 found that ultrasound damage was similar to that caused by x-rays and mustard gas.
The immediate effects of ultrasonic vibrations upon the nuclei and chromosomes of living plant cells show marked visible resemblances to the primary and secondary effects produced by electromagnetic radiations such as x-ray… and also to those produced by mustard gas.
In a 1966 article, researcher Mikio Kato demonstrated that ultrasound may be even more likely to cause mutations than x‑rays.
Ultrasonic vibration would be a better proximate cause of mutation than X-ray irradiation.
In an article published in 1979, ultrasound researchers working with mice observed ultrasonically-induced fetal malformations and brain defects similar to those previously associated with x-rays.
Brain defects were produced at all stages of gestation but tended to involve the forebrain more at earlier times. Defects such as fusions of the ribs or vertebrae, spina bifida, and limb reductions were produced... The types of malformation produced by ultrasound thus appear to follow the same pattern of change with gestational age as do those produced by X-ray irradiation.
A rat study published in 1986 concluded that ultrasound caused brain defects similar to those triggered by x-rays and extreme heating.
It is clear that the stage of gestation at the time of ultrasound exposure influences the types of malformations that are produced and the organ systems which are affected… Malformations of the heart and great vessels were primarily associated with exposures at 9 [days gestation]. Fusion defects of the vertebral column and limb defects progressively increased in frequency with exposures later in gestation… Brain defects were produced by exposure at all stages although incidence was less at 12 [days gestation]… It appears that the pattern of sensitivity with gestational age for malformation production by ultrasound is similar to that reported for ionizing radiation and for thermal insult.”
In 2012, it was determined that rat fetuses exposed to ultrasound suffered from “bioeffects similar to X-ray exposure.” Researchers found “substantial alterations in gene expression” including those “implicated in important developmental signaling pathways.” The researchers concluded that ultrasound “could probably affect expression of highly important genes implicated in embryonic development” and “should be used with caution, particularly in early pregnancy.”
Just added your book to the subchapter:
The Dark Side of Prenatal Ultrasound1 sums up 1600 references proving the dangers of ultrasound:
1. Excessive heat accumulation in the bones
2. DNA damage
3. Cell destruction
4. Birth defects
5. Fetal death from overexposure
Great. The book actually ended up with over 1800 citations. There is so much damage being done, it is hard to keep track of it all. Infertility and sterility are also a result of this radiation exposure.