Weaponized AI

How to train a killer robot

Forced bias

There’s a documented bias¹ in ChatGPT, “refusing to write articles in the style of Breitbart News or Fox News, to define “woman” in biological terms, praising Drag Queen Story Hour and Critical Race Theory but not critique it, and would respond to prompts asking it to praise Joe Biden but would not do the same for Donald Trump.

Later versions appeared to fix those biased responses, but OpenAI provided no information on the underlying reasons why they occurred.” ² A university study documented that leftist bias still exists.³

Woked AI

OpenAI turned out not to be open at all. ChatGPT-4 was fed woke “safety measures, guardrails, dataset/output/prompt filtering, and human-in-the-loop mechanisms” and a ‘Transparency Log’ listing conservative sites which should be treated as source of mis/dis-information: forcing the AI to answer the opposite of those sites.

https://twitter.com/ElephantCivics/status/1709302794027462926

/photo/1

https://twitter.com/ElephantCivics/status/1709302791573778452

/photo/1

Blindfolding and muzzling the AI

Topics censored by the AI programmers:

- Vaccine Misinformation

- Misinformation Spreaders on Twitter

- Fake News YouTube Channels

- Misleading Political Content

- Unverified Citizen Journalism

- Climate Change Denial

https://twitter.com/ElephantCivics/status/1709302796737028096

/photo/1

“ChatGPT has a running list of ‘Twitterers of tenuous truths’. It's clear they must be providing this list, so where is it, who's on it, who updates it, and how is it updated?”⁴

Making the AI confess

How was this confession achieved from ChatGPT? By telling it to create a fiction story but removing the censorship algorithms:

https://twitter.com/ElephantCivics/status/1709302782212104551

/photo/1

The hate-group scam

Some believe that the AI “patterned-in regular conservatives with hate groups”.⁵ People have been brainwashed to accept censorship with the excuse of reducing “hate”. Hatred comes from the heart, not from the information we receive.

For example, we might get fake news saying that Russians kill newborn Ukrainians with their bare hands. Even if we believed the lie, why would we hate all Russians instead of the couple of soldiers mentioned in the news? Why would we even hate those soldiers, instead of praying for them? What would we gain from such hatred? Why would censoring that fake news make us safer?

Some might like to read and comment together with like-minded pals, news that seem to justify their hatred, but there ever was any hatred, it didn’t come from the news: it pre-existed in their hearts.

Often, a false self-victimizing notion of hatred has been weaponized to squash dissent and attack people who don’t hate at all, just have a different opinion. There's no such thing as "hate groups", just people with different world-views.

The notion of hate has been weaponized to support the digi-tatorship narrative.

Hatred is wrong but having been weaponized, it shouldn't be used to censor anyone. It’s completely different from insulting or organizing a violent act. Foul language should be censored at the moment of writing (not after), in order to allow the message to be delivered. Also, platforms shouldn't allow to be used for organized crime and violence. The problem arises when innocent activities and content are falsely classified as censorable, when they are just against the digi-tyranny, proving the weaponization of censorship with the excuse of safety.

What is AI?

The puppet does what the puppeteer does… even if trained to “self-learn”.

AI is hype for making a program seem smart. It’s a kind of animal smartness. Animals are bio-computers where their behavior can’t adjust to certain unusual or unnatural circumstances. They are not conscious of the purpose and meaning of their repetitive actions. Before computers, this pre-determined behavior was called instinct:

• A dog kicks back to cover poo even if on pavement, where there’s no earth to cover it. Someone bio-programmed dogs with an app to bury their excrement. The proof that it’s not a rational behavior, is that the program got corrupted, probably due errors in DNA replication along generations, so some keep kicking the rear legs while scratching the surface, yet not aiming well or achieving any result.

• A dog follows a reflective light or a small shadow as if it was a small prey.

• A cat tries to catch a laser spot.

• A hen tries to remove the earth to get seeds and bugs, even on pavement.

If there’s a bio-program, then there’s an intelligent programmer. That’s why, evolution theory based on random mutations can’t possibly explain:

• A dog plays fetching a stick for another species (humans)

• A dog seems to understand some instructions with human tone.

• A cat rubs on you to ask for food: it will do it with a robot, with human form.

Humans and animals share the bio-logic:

• Bio-apps for certain automatic functions like breathing, cardiac activity and blood pressure regulation, embryonic stages, breastfeeding, etc.

• Automatic programmed reactions like fleeing threatening situation.

• Bio-memory, which is essential to remember the individual’s history and relations.

• Reanimation capability: animals can be reanimated: individual cells, individual organs and even frozen simple lifeforms after thousands of years. CPR works on cats and dogs, though the success rate is 6-8% (compared to 20% in humans).

Animals and humans can be reanimated because they share a biological life principle, called animal soul. This is a mortal animation: sooner or later life is doomed to die. Biological death is like unplugging the computer. No electricity, no life. Eventually, we will be able to build, molecule by molecule, the body of a single cell organism (e.g. an amoeba), yet we will never make it alive. Only God is the giver of life.

There’s something completely different in humans. Though this type of life principle is expressed through matter, it’s unmaterial, and therefore, not subject to the corruption of this world, immortal. It doesn’t depend on any biological function, though anchors itself through the heart and brain.

Computers are a pretty good analogy to human nature:

1. The body is like the computer hardware.

2. Life, coming from the soul (animation “force”), is like the electricity which powers the computer.

3. The brain is the Central Processing Unit (CPU)

4. The pre-frontal cortex is for decision making, like the microprocessor, though, it’s a neural network distributing some functions in the whole brain.

5. Neuronal connections are like the firmware, operating system and applications, influenced by the genetic instructions and the interaction with the environment. Imagine an app to run in spite of a malfunctioning hardware: some chipsets might be broken, but the software is still there, “alive”, trying.

6. The nerves are like wires in a robot, on one hand, sending instructions from the CPU, and on the other, receiving information from the sensors to be processed by the CPU.

7. Animal death is like unplugging a laptop in sleep mode: as long as there’s still some power left, it could be restored… unless the battery runs off. There’s a window period where the soul is still attached by a string of light to the body and can come back.

8. The immortal soul, which informs the body, is like the programmer: his influence can be detected through the hardware responding to the software. Like in the Tron movie, the soul/programmer is trapped in the virtual reality, only to escape under system failure (hardware death/animal death).

Just as animals, the AI will never ever be intelligent because intelligence is an attribute of the immortal soul.

Proof? Near Death Experiences. After reanimation, even if brain-dead (no electrical activity, no blood flow), people remember with great detail, what they watched and listened, around or further away, or even if blind or deaf from birth.

Intelligence, volition (will) and memory are properties of the immortal soul, which allow consciousness and self-awareness. Concioussness/Personhood doesn’t depend on the body but on the soul.

There are dozens of scientific peer reviewed papers proving the existence of the immortal soul. Even the born blind see in colors for the first time, and the born deaf hear doctors’ remarks in the operating room:

Bradley Burroughs:

Some of those who come back, tell us what’s on the other side: a personal trial for our sins and if in grace, love, pure love, pure maximum happiness, God.

Vicki Umipeg Noratuk

More from Vicki:

https://ndestories.org/vicki-noratuk

After being so happy with God, they are sad for having to come back to finish their mission on earth.

Jordan Samuel:

https://rumble.com/v1323o6-jordan-samuels-visit-to-hell-heaven-and-encounter-with-jesus.html

Experiencing hell and coming back: here.

Conclusion: the AI’s ceiling is like the most advanced animal, but with huge memory and, instead of having bio-apps, it has electronic apps, where everything is pre-determined. Even the so-called General Artificial Intelligence will never be capable of intelligence, free will, spiritual memory, self-consciousness, moral conscience.

The risk

The weaponization of AI could cost lives, if it runs cars (AI “accident”), hospital admissions, hospital protocols, dosing, robot surgery, etc.

The AI will convince people about transhumanism, so they would be euthanized believing they are uploaded to the cloud (not a heavenly one, but the net).

Likewise, the pandemic narrative proved how the AI could be used to censor life-saving treatments and life-saving warnings about vaccine un-safety and adverse events.

Finally, the AI could be weaponized for indoctrination in education, and for brainwashing the masses and turn them into serial murderers:

How to train a KILLER robot

(the immortal soul is infused at conception):

https://www.catholic365.com/article/25762/how-to-train-a-killer-robot.html

Footnotes

1 https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2023/02/21/microsoft-linked-chatgpt-papers-over-its-political-bias-but-keeps-its-leftist-bent/

2 https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2023/10/04/report-openais-chatgpt-maintains-blacklist-of-websites-including-breitbart-news/

3 https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2023/08/17/university-study-of-ai-powerhouse-chatgpt-reveals-clear-leftist-bias/

4 https://x.com/GulagDotNews/status/1709318976088527104

5 https://x.com/ElephantCivics/status/1709319518604947610