7 Comments

My response is that there are no democracies at present.

Admitedly, this is a bald statement, so let me elaborate. This argument raged in the US more than one and a half centuries ago. It was settled to most American critic's satisfaction when Abraham Lincoln provided the lyrical definion of "Government of the people, by the people and for the people". Before the US Constitution was mandated, Thomas Paine also defined democracy in his book "The Rights of Man" also noting that "All authority resides in the people". Among his clauses were "The people shall decide the manner of taxes, how much, and how this shall be dispensed"; and "The aged, destitute, and infirm must be looked after by the government".

Not one element of democracy now exists in any government on Earth. The words of Paine and Lincoln were extinguished from political or constitutional language. Moreover, every single book on the subject of genuine democracy was removed from public libraries by 2003, and burned. Specifically, burned; not given away free like other books. How many people know that? Alert for freedom we are not.

The most recent democracy was a 200 year Chinese-led version on an island where Indonesia presently stands; it was demolished by the Dutch colonists. And to correct one piece of globalist propaganda, the word democracy may well be Greek, but the Greeks never at any stage practiced democracy. For a start, only 19% of Greeks had the vote. Only those whose mother and father were pure Athenian were qualified to vote. Which means that they 'represented' everybody else.

We need to understand that representationalism is not even vaguely related to democracy. Any dictator can claim to represent the people and, in fact, most do, spuriously. The cold reality is that nobody has ever represented anybody else.

Lord Acton summed it all up with "When you elect another person to do your thinking for you; to determine your future for you; you place your personal power in his hands, as do others. This power becomes cumulative and power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely".

For 200 years, a cabal of investment bankers have used their usurous wealth to propagandise the people into rejecting democracy or, at the very least, to be persuaded another system is democracy. A clear example of the falseness of this sleight-of-hand is the term 'majority', then reshaped to 'numerical majority', then defined as 'democrtic majority', then 'democracy'. Let us look objectively at this.

Parliament/Congress has just voted on a measure and the party in power has won with 51% of the vote. This is declared a "democratic majority", but is this an apt description?

What in fact has happend is that 49% oppose the measure, which means that the community is absolutely divided on the issue. In what sane world does one proceed with a measure that half the nation opposes? This is a formula for disaster, not a triumph of consensus.

It gets worse, more sinisterly, the media needs only to sway the vote of the swinging voter; in fact, only that percentage of the swinging voters needed to settle the majority vote. That is clearly media dictatorship. And that presumes the parliamentry vote mirrors the will of the community. This is almost never the case.

In the real world, politicians are feted by lobbyists, praised, made to feel like gods, and persuaded that they are above mere mortals and that ordinary morals and laws do not aply to them. It is only a matter of time before most politicians have been compromised by sexual liaisons that are illegal and videoed. To use the impolite term, blackmailed. This was the function of Ghislaine Maxwell and her equivilent in every country in the world. This is government in the 21st century, and what we are convinced is 'democracy'.

How to repair? Wipe the slate clean and start again, but ensure that the replacement goverment follows policies formulated by the entire well informed community. This means that media also, must represent the needs of the people, so goodbye, Rupert Murdoch, current emperor/dictator.

Expand full comment

Could you please provide a list of the books burned? A link to the news source?

Those books must be very important in order to deserve such persecution.

The decarb Nazis wrote about the need to stop printing on paper: everything digital will be ideal to change history. We need to save the good books ASAP. Hide them until after 2040. Especially the Bible: it will be searched and destroyed for the passages against the Great Reset new religion (homosex, abortion, human rights of the animals and sex robots, etc.)

Expand full comment

I have no idea. The media would never admit to complicity. I only noticed that the books I was aware of, like the Works of the Irish Monks and recording of democracies, were burned. Only one librarian admitted to actually following those orders. but a search of similar books showed all were withdrawin at the same time.

Expand full comment

Add that with deep fake, they can destroy anybody by sending massive private messages.

That's why the only way out is townhall face-to- face hands-up democracy:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/reinventing-democracy

Even more when they are capable of organizing this (they did the same in Brazilia);

J6: what THEY don't want YOU to know

The fake riot was mason-planned, incited and guided by FBI agents, who broke into the Capitol !!!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/j6-what-you-need-to-know

Expand full comment

Thank you - excellent and detailed!

Expand full comment

Thanks, Frederick.

Expand full comment