Conclusion
Charlie Kirk’s assassination plot sends a powerful message to the world showing a modus operandi, a playbook, that is being used over and over:
They have unlimited money with which they buy and corrupt anything or anyone for sale.
They infiltrate any successful organization through huge donations opening the door for new efficient employees surrounding the founder, just as they did with Amnesty International and so many foundations.
All those in power are in their pockets or dead: if they can’t convince, bribe, extort, sue or threaten, they murder.
They control dominant media, influencers, AIs and have a swarm of social media puppets attacking whoever speaks the truth out.
Intro
As far as I know, there are some points that top influencers haven’t found yet:
Charlie could have been saved from rooftop line of sight just by sitting him at the back of the tent (no shooting angle) or with a transparent shield.
There was no drone airport restriction: they deliberately didn’t use drones to watch the rooftops.
Charlie wasn’t shot from a drone, yet the spy jet (HADES) pathway is evidence that the DoD was involved.
$ 1 billion spent by Israel on PR, AFTER Charlie’s assassination.
I’ve tried to sum up a lot of information: all the pieces fit like in a puzzle. It’s the official narrative that contradicts the evidence. Please add whatever is missing in comments and follow Candace Owens, Baron Coleman, Kasia, NissCee, Tucker Carlson, Jimmy Dore, etc.
4k video = 4k words. 5 seconds
Rob O’Neill, U.S. Navy SEAL Team Six, shot and killed Osama bin Laden:
“I’ve never seen a shirt move like that, that looks like an explosion to me.”
Watch this vid for 3 seconds, pause frame by frame:
The T-shirt inflates from Charlie’s right lower side to his left upper side, covering his neck
When it deflates and the T-shirt’s collar goes down, you see the hole in his neck, yet the T-shirt has no hole !!!
When it goes down it shows the blood mark from touching Charlie’s neck, not a hole. Where did the shrapnel come from then? From beneath his chest !!!
How could a bullet go through the T-shirt making a hole in his neck but not in the T-shirt? The hole was made from the blast inside the T-shirt!
“Superman neck” ? !!!
They think we are idiot! 30-06 caliber goes through 18 metal plates (STOP signs):
Note: luckily it wasn’t more … he might have hit his own car in the background =)))
Injuries on Charlie’s Chest Reveal Potential Source(s) of Blast
A chest explosive device is the only rational possibility, since:
There was no entry or exit wound from Charlie’s back. This was confirmed by the autopsy. Charlie’s team made sure that the complete film from behind wouldn’t be released, only a cropped version not showing the crowd. What did they want to hide?
The bullet doesn’t match the wound. It’s clear that the alleged .30-06 rifle wasn’t the source of the wound, since it should have blown off Charlie’s head.
Charlie fell to his left side as if the source was an explosive device in his chest, not backwards as expected from a frontal shot.
No K9 bomb-sniffing dogs on site but dogs were used to “find” the rifle.
The Feds quickly removed any evidence with trace amounts of the explosive material:
Charlie’s clothes (given to Erika and vanished by her). Charlie’s shirt wasn’t given to her and she never asked for it.
Charlie’s mic given to Erika, also not available for lab testing
Charlie’s car: which was quickly washed and auctioned.
The top soil of the crime scene, which was removed and paved over that very weekend.
Also, the team-members in close contact with Charlie got rid of all their clothes.
Inside job. Why was Charlie’s security detail smiling when he went down?
Watch this 4k video, one of the few we’ve got so far, thanks to the deliberate inaction of the FBI (there were hundreds of people filmed while shooting videos with their phones but no one requested them):
Do you see Charlie’s security guy with a sadistic smirk, seemingly pulling a trigger under his sleeve just before the blast?
Do you see the necklace proving that the explosion came from inside the shirt and not from outside?
What is this white thing under the security guy’s arm, close to his elbow?
Confirmed: Charlie’s “assassin”, Tyler Robinson, was a patsy, a decoy
Proven planted evidence:
The screwdriver which didn’t match the rifle’ screws
The rifle had dust and the most degraded (old) DNA from Tyler Robinson
The text messages photo of a phone have no dating and no meta-data. The part where the time should have shown was conveniently “broken”.
It was proven that one of the videos presented by the police, allegedly showing that Tyler Robinson was in the parking garage was deliberately distorted (stretched vertically) to make the person thinner, because it showed a wider different person.
It was proven that another video presented as evidence showed a left-handed person, while Robinson was right handed
Another “evidence” video showed the car license plate deliberately blurred because it wasn’t Robinson’s car.
The note was destroyed by Robinson’s room-mate and homosexual couple: instead of being the prime suspect, the FBI protects him
Kash Patel, FBI Director, blocked investigation into foreign involvement in Kirk’s assassination
Tulsi Gabbard was serving as the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), a cabinet-level role that acts as the principal intelligence advisor reporting directly to the President.
Joe Kent began serving as Tulsi Gabbard’s chief of staff at ODNI in February 2025, waiting for his Senate confirmation as head of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) in July 2025, reporting to Tulsi.
Kent was pushed to resign from his post in March 2026 for being against U.S. attack on Iran. Same with Tulsi.
Kent still has trouble believing that Robinson acted as a lone gunman:
NCTC was investigating the Egyptian planes on the ground (frequently flying to Israel) and the 5 vehicles Duncan aviation rented for them, the ones in the video that get in front and behind Tyler’s car and lead him away with a follow car.
There were social media accounts beforehand saying that Kirk would die on UVU campus that day. Some were promising solid leads connecting the crime to foreign actors.
FBI director, Kash Patel, called Tulsi, and ordered Joe Kent to stop the investigation.
Under Trump’s direct orders?
Because the investigation had to be stopped?
Because Israel was involved?
Why did Kash Patel shut down Tulsi and Joe Kent from investigating foreign involvement in Charlie Kirk’s murder?
The FBI operates under the Department of Justice, a cabinet-level department within the executive branch, thus answering directly to the President. The President may remove the FBI director at any time, for any reason. That’s why there’s nothing controversial that the FBI director does, without prior approval of the President: his job is on the line.
Did Trump push Tulsi and Joe out of the government right AFTER Charlie’s assassination? Why?
Note: Previously, Kent was also blocked by Patel (FBI) from investigating the foreign ties of solid leads in Trumps’ assassination attempt in Butler. There’s a lot of evidence that Thomas Matthew Crooks wasn’t a lone gun but a puppet.
