Thank you so much for the confirmation. Where did this fool even come from? Which rock did he crawl out from under? I knew nothing about him yet kept hearing his name and had a bad feeling. One Obomba was enough.
Here is a picture of me personally handing Vivek a copy of "Government" - The Biggest Scam in History, exposing how inter-generational organized crime runs the "government" and media at the Porcupine Freedom Festival in June. Never heard back. We cross-posted this article to our subscribers. Great work! https://artofliberty.substack.com/p/the-art-of-liberty-foundation-porcfest
Etienne, every work you do makes a difference, even if we lose: imagine just waking up one person, means that person has a higher chance to save himself and the ones he loves. May God repay you 100 to 1 !
Is anybody really considering voting for Ramaswamy? He wasn't on my short list before this article, but reading this certainly helped cement my decision.
I'd love to see a long form interview of him addressing all that is laid out in this article.Thanks for this analysis, not sure he could cover his tracks as this is very damming. However, because I don't know who is behind 'Scientific Progress' I must question this info... it's possible that the article is designed to character assassinate him as he rises in the polls. We have sadly reached the point that flushing out the complete truth is a long, hard road with many potholes to fall into.
Yes...I've actually heard him say some of the comments you have mentioned but the framing of some of those comments is a bit off (but I haven't fallen down the rabbit hole on him) ...again...great analysis but things, like the letter from the WEF, needs to be put in his face on camera for his explanation. Everyone is entitled to their defense. (PS *its citation)
Sep 7, 2023·edited Sep 7, 2023Liked by Prof. Fred Nazar
Add one more thing to your fine presentation: the claim Vivek is an accomplished pianist. NOT! I took the time to listen to all his YouTube videos of playing piano, and one on Rumble. He played only Rondo Alla Turca by Mozart in all of them. Is he a one trick pony? I learned that piece when I was in junior high or thereabouts, so it is not an advanced piece by any means. And he makes egregious mistakes playing wrong notes, and it's part of his "mastery" because he makes the SAME mistakes in all his performances. And if that weren't bad enough, he has some serious problems with tempo changes. Accomplished, he's not. This is elementary playing my dear Watson.
It is concerning that he will accept this bogus claim about his accomplishments, and then essentially brag about it by playing in political situations every chance he gets.
I sensed Pence was a mole during the final stage of the 2016 campaign: when the “Access Hollywood tape” was released too attack Trump, Pence refused to communicate with Trump in the ensuing weeks. I was furious and dumbfounded about Pence’s reaction.
But one thing I still cannot figure out: why president Trump didn’t have his own “intelligence team” keeping close tabs on who is doing what and their background? (It’s impossible for Pence to be clean without conspiracy prep.) Spying on his own VP, of course. The safety of the United States is at stake!
For example, Colonel Douglas MacGregor was a top, excellent choice, but the rest of his appointments were outright disastrous. I dare to say I could have chosen for Trump a better cabinet.
As all-fathers fearfully & wonderfully made godson and sovereign witness of the good people of united America for these United States, harken:
FEEBLE ARGUMENTS FROM THE STATUS QUO
Status quo - No legal authority: "This is a rogue band of citizens with no legal authority," said Wes Oliver, Associate Professor and director of the criminal justice program at Duquesne University School of Law. "To what extent there was ever a common law grand jury system that was self-creating, there no longer is." (No supporting authorities offered)
REBUTTAL –
In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S. Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992), Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury• is neither part of the judicial, executive nor legislative branches of government, but instead belongs to the people. It is in effect a fourth branch of government "governed" and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its authority emanates from the Bill of Rights.
JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA WENT ON TO SAY:
(in U .S v. Williams) "The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right". United States v. Chanen, 549 F.2d 1306, 1312 (CA9 1977) (quoting Nixon v. Silica, 159 U.S. App. D.C. 58, 70, n. 54. 487 F.2d 700, 712, n. 54 (1973)), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 825, 98 S. Ct. 72, 54 L.Ed.2d 83 (1977).; United States v. John H. Williams, Jr.; 112 S. Ct. 1735; 504 U.S. 36; 118 L.Ed.2d 352; No. 90-1972.
"All laws, rules and practices which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void" [Marburg v. Madison, 5th US (2 Cranch) 137, 180]
"There can be no limitation on the power of the people of the United States (of America). By their authority the State Constitutions were made and by their authority the Constitution for the United States (of America) was established..." Hauenstein vs. Lynham (100 US 483).
"The United States Supreme Court declares that the "Sovereignty" remains with the "people" and resides with the "people"...Yick Wo vs. Hopkins and Woo Lee Hopkins (118 US 356).
"No action can be taken against a sovereign in the non-constitutional courts of either the United states or the state courts and any such action is considered the crime of Barratry1. Barratry is an offense at common law." State vs. Batson 17 S.E.2d 511. 512, 513.
Union ‘affirmation’:
State v. Shumaker, 200 Ind. 716, (Ind. 1928) “CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — Sovereign Power — Vested in Citizens — Power to do as They Please. — In this state, all sovereign power is vested in the citizens of the state, who have the power, by virtue of such sovereignty, to do whatever they please, except as limited by themselves in the Constitution. p. 720.”
State v. Shumaker, 200 Ind. 716, 717 (Ind. 1928) “CONTEMPT — Of Supreme Court — May be Instituted by any Citizen of State. — A prosecution for contempt of the Supreme Court, by virtue of a fiction of law, is instituted by the people themselves; the presentment is not limited to the Attorney-General, but may be presented by any citizen of the state. p. 723.”
1 BARRETOR. In criminal law. A common mover, exciter, or maintainer of suits and quarrels either in courts or elsewhere in the country; a disturber of the peace who spreads false rumors and calumnies, whereby discord and disquiet may grow among neighbors. Co. Litt. 368. One who frequently excites and stirs up groundless suits and quarrels, either at law or otherwise. Mate v. Batson, 220 N.C. 411, 17 S.E.2d 511, 512, 513. BARRETRY. In criminal law. The act or offense of a barretor, v.,) usually called "common barretry." 4 Steph. Comrn. 262.
Res judicata (Latin: “a thing adjudged”)
Barratry: In criminal law, an act committed by the master or mariners of a vessel, for some unlawful or fraudulent purpose, contrary to their duty to the owners, whereby the latter sustain injury.
Barratry may include negligence, if so gross as to evidence fraud. Marcardier v. Insurance Co., 8 Cranch, 49, 3 h Ed, 481; Atkinson v. Insurance Co., 05 N. Y. 53S; Atkinson v. Insurance Co., 4 Daly (N. Y.) 10; Patapsco Ins. Co. v. Coulter, 3 Pet. 231, 7 L. Ed. 659; Lawton v. Insurance Co., 2 Cush. (Mass.) 501; Earle v. Rowcroft, 8 East, 135.
Barratry is some fraudulent act of the master or mariners, tending to their own benefit, to the prejudice of the owner of the vessel, without his privity or consent. Kendrick v. Delafield, 2 Caines “(N. Y.) 67.
Barratry is any unlawful, fraudulent, or dishonest act of the master or mariners, and every violation of duty by them arising from gross and culpable negligence contrary to their duty to the owner of the vessel, which might work loss or injury to him in the course of the voyage insured.
A mutiny of the crew, and forcible dispossession by them of the master and other officers from the ship, is a form of barratry. Greene v. Pacific Mut. Ins. Co., 9 Allen (Mass.) 217.
In criminal law. Common barratry is the practice of exciting groundless judicial proceedings.
Never forget our political, spiritual and binding force by which we seek in good will to serve all walks of life seeking unanimity similarly situated thereby:
"In essentials, unanimity. In non-essentials, liberty. In all things, honor."
Be wise, safe & blessed,
Arthur
Notice: U.P.C. applicable
Tel: 1-509-862-3119 (text first before call)
Please forgive any syntax or grammatical errors..
P. S.: Please, most graciously grant whatever courtesy for any incorrect scripture, syntax or grammatical errors wherever found throughout our life as unintended clerical errors that all are free to adjust and correct to account properly for remedial recourse our humble efforts intend.
But if grace fails our feeble entreaties, then as Don Corleone says ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
Why?
“We are increasingly governed not by law or elected representatives but by an unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable committee of lawyers applying no will but their own.” < Robert Bork..
This is excellenct due diligence on Ramaswampy. Only 2 things I would add. I read his parents were of the Brahmin caste in India; think entitlement on steroids.
One account I read said he was given the drug by Pfizer which had found it didn't work.
Thank you for completely uncovering the deception of Vivek Ramaswampy. What a snake this Vivek is? Unfortunately, even so, this Vivek seems to be better than traitor Mike Pence.
Exactly: it's plausible that they are trying to convince Trump to have him as VP, so Vivek can backstab Trump again exactly as Pence did. They need a mason VP, especially if Trump dies!
Think about it: why would a person, with nearly a billion dollars to enjoy life, spend 10 million on his own campaign, knowing beforehand that he has no chance whatsoever to win against Trump... and even if Trump is vanished (lawfare, assassination, natural death), Vivek has no chance against a proven Governor like DeSantis: Vivek has zero political experience and connections!
... just another see.lectable Globalist in diapers looking to please his puppeteer-parent$
Thank you so much for the confirmation. Where did this fool even come from? Which rock did he crawl out from under? I knew nothing about him yet kept hearing his name and had a bad feeling. One Obomba was enough.
An anagram of his name is 'smarmy viva weak'. Off putting on its own.
Here is a picture of me personally handing Vivek a copy of "Government" - The Biggest Scam in History, exposing how inter-generational organized crime runs the "government" and media at the Porcupine Freedom Festival in June. Never heard back. We cross-posted this article to our subscribers. Great work! https://artofliberty.substack.com/p/the-art-of-liberty-foundation-porcfest
Thanks! Maybe he didn't have time to read it, since he has to catch up with masonic "literature", right?
Loved your explanation on The End of COVID.
Thank you! It means so much to know that my work is making a difference.
Etienne, every work you do makes a difference, even if we lose: imagine just waking up one person, means that person has a higher chance to save himself and the ones he loves. May God repay you 100 to 1 !
Your welcome, and thank you for being selfless.
Is anybody really considering voting for Ramaswamy? He wasn't on my short list before this article, but reading this certainly helped cement my decision.
His name alone. Really? People better get wise and quick!
Swami Rabbitima
Right! Everyone's a rabbit!:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowery_Bugs
That's why this is the only way out:
How about REAL democracy: townhall republican democracy?
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/reinventing-democracy
Brody hopping down the street reminds me of the way I see people give in to the woke agenda, like there’s no escaping it.
'smarmy viva weak' is an anagram of his name, sadly no rabbits in it though.
I'd love to see a long form interview of him addressing all that is laid out in this article.Thanks for this analysis, not sure he could cover his tracks as this is very damming. However, because I don't know who is behind 'Scientific Progress' I must question this info... it's possible that the article is designed to character assassinate him as he rises in the polls. We have sadly reached the point that flushing out the complete truth is a long, hard road with many potholes to fall into.
I'm the author. Everything I wrote has it's citation. Most come from his own Twitter account and interviews: no room for manipulation, right?
Yes...I've actually heard him say some of the comments you have mentioned but the framing of some of those comments is a bit off (but I haven't fallen down the rabbit hole on him) ...again...great analysis but things, like the letter from the WEF, needs to be put in his face on camera for his explanation. Everyone is entitled to their defense. (PS *its citation)
“Trust no one; question everything”. My motto for many years
"These days, paranoia is a survival virtue" =)
I'd just love to see the door hitting his ass on the way out. So sick of the Soros plants.
Add one more thing to your fine presentation: the claim Vivek is an accomplished pianist. NOT! I took the time to listen to all his YouTube videos of playing piano, and one on Rumble. He played only Rondo Alla Turca by Mozart in all of them. Is he a one trick pony? I learned that piece when I was in junior high or thereabouts, so it is not an advanced piece by any means. And he makes egregious mistakes playing wrong notes, and it's part of his "mastery" because he makes the SAME mistakes in all his performances. And if that weren't bad enough, he has some serious problems with tempo changes. Accomplished, he's not. This is elementary playing my dear Watson.
It is concerning that he will accept this bogus claim about his accomplishments, and then essentially brag about it by playing in political situations every chance he gets.
I sensed Pence was a mole during the final stage of the 2016 campaign: when the “Access Hollywood tape” was released too attack Trump, Pence refused to communicate with Trump in the ensuing weeks. I was furious and dumbfounded about Pence’s reaction.
But one thing I still cannot figure out: why president Trump didn’t have his own “intelligence team” keeping close tabs on who is doing what and their background? (It’s impossible for Pence to be clean without conspiracy prep.) Spying on his own VP, of course. The safety of the United States is at stake!
For example, Colonel Douglas MacGregor was a top, excellent choice, but the rest of his appointments were outright disastrous. I dare to say I could have chosen for Trump a better cabinet.
No doubt he trusted the wrong ones and that you could have done it better!
Or anyone with some internet search techniques other than gogle.
And Trump trumped himself when sacking Bannon and others...
I hope he's now aware about the masonic plot, otherwise, he'll repeat this mistake.
That's why every country needs a law to unmask masons in Government:
16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison
Perhaps Trump did. He may be cleverer than people think. Play dumb for deception.
As all-fathers fearfully & wonderfully made godson and sovereign witness of the good people of united America for these United States, harken:
FEEBLE ARGUMENTS FROM THE STATUS QUO
Status quo - No legal authority: "This is a rogue band of citizens with no legal authority," said Wes Oliver, Associate Professor and director of the criminal justice program at Duquesne University School of Law. "To what extent there was ever a common law grand jury system that was self-creating, there no longer is." (No supporting authorities offered)
REBUTTAL –
In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S. Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992), Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury• is neither part of the judicial, executive nor legislative branches of government, but instead belongs to the people. It is in effect a fourth branch of government "governed" and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its authority emanates from the Bill of Rights.
JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA WENT ON TO SAY:
(in U .S v. Williams) "The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right". United States v. Chanen, 549 F.2d 1306, 1312 (CA9 1977) (quoting Nixon v. Silica, 159 U.S. App. D.C. 58, 70, n. 54. 487 F.2d 700, 712, n. 54 (1973)), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 825, 98 S. Ct. 72, 54 L.Ed.2d 83 (1977).; United States v. John H. Williams, Jr.; 112 S. Ct. 1735; 504 U.S. 36; 118 L.Ed.2d 352; No. 90-1972.
"All laws, rules and practices which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void" [Marburg v. Madison, 5th US (2 Cranch) 137, 180]
"There can be no limitation on the power of the people of the United States (of America). By their authority the State Constitutions were made and by their authority the Constitution for the United States (of America) was established..." Hauenstein vs. Lynham (100 US 483).
"The United States Supreme Court declares that the "Sovereignty" remains with the "people" and resides with the "people"...Yick Wo vs. Hopkins and Woo Lee Hopkins (118 US 356).
"No action can be taken against a sovereign in the non-constitutional courts of either the United states or the state courts and any such action is considered the crime of Barratry1. Barratry is an offense at common law." State vs. Batson 17 S.E.2d 511. 512, 513.
Union ‘affirmation’:
State v. Shumaker, 200 Ind. 716, (Ind. 1928) “CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — Sovereign Power — Vested in Citizens — Power to do as They Please. — In this state, all sovereign power is vested in the citizens of the state, who have the power, by virtue of such sovereignty, to do whatever they please, except as limited by themselves in the Constitution. p. 720.”
State v. Shumaker, 200 Ind. 716, 717 (Ind. 1928) “CONTEMPT — Of Supreme Court — May be Instituted by any Citizen of State. — A prosecution for contempt of the Supreme Court, by virtue of a fiction of law, is instituted by the people themselves; the presentment is not limited to the Attorney-General, but may be presented by any citizen of the state. p. 723.”
(State v. Shumaker, 200 Ind. 716 | Casetext Search + Citator)
_____________________
1 BARRETOR. In criminal law. A common mover, exciter, or maintainer of suits and quarrels either in courts or elsewhere in the country; a disturber of the peace who spreads false rumors and calumnies, whereby discord and disquiet may grow among neighbors. Co. Litt. 368. One who frequently excites and stirs up groundless suits and quarrels, either at law or otherwise. Mate v. Batson, 220 N.C. 411, 17 S.E.2d 511, 512, 513. BARRETRY. In criminal law. The act or offense of a barretor, v.,) usually called "common barretry." 4 Steph. Comrn. 262.
Res judicata (Latin: “a thing adjudged”)
Barratry: In criminal law, an act committed by the master or mariners of a vessel, for some unlawful or fraudulent purpose, contrary to their duty to the owners, whereby the latter sustain injury.
Barratry may include negligence, if so gross as to evidence fraud. Marcardier v. Insurance Co., 8 Cranch, 49, 3 h Ed, 481; Atkinson v. Insurance Co., 05 N. Y. 53S; Atkinson v. Insurance Co., 4 Daly (N. Y.) 10; Patapsco Ins. Co. v. Coulter, 3 Pet. 231, 7 L. Ed. 659; Lawton v. Insurance Co., 2 Cush. (Mass.) 501; Earle v. Rowcroft, 8 East, 135.
Barratry is some fraudulent act of the master or mariners, tending to their own benefit, to the prejudice of the owner of the vessel, without his privity or consent. Kendrick v. Delafield, 2 Caines “(N. Y.) 67.
Barratry is any unlawful, fraudulent, or dishonest act of the master or mariners, and every violation of duty by them arising from gross and culpable negligence contrary to their duty to the owner of the vessel, which might work loss or injury to him in the course of the voyage insured.
A mutiny of the crew, and forcible dispossession by them of the master and other officers from the ship, is a form of barratry. Greene v. Pacific Mut. Ins. Co., 9 Allen (Mass.) 217.
In criminal law. Common barratry is the practice of exciting groundless judicial proceedings.
Never forget our political, spiritual and binding force by which we seek in good will to serve all walks of life seeking unanimity similarly situated thereby:
"In essentials, unanimity. In non-essentials, liberty. In all things, honor."
Be wise, safe & blessed,
Arthur
Notice: U.P.C. applicable
Tel: 1-509-862-3119 (text first before call)
Please forgive any syntax or grammatical errors..
P. S.: Please, most graciously grant whatever courtesy for any incorrect scripture, syntax or grammatical errors wherever found throughout our life as unintended clerical errors that all are free to adjust and correct to account properly for remedial recourse our humble efforts intend.
But if grace fails our feeble entreaties, then as Don Corleone says ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
Why?
“We are increasingly governed not by law or elected representatives but by an unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable committee of lawyers applying no will but their own.” < Robert Bork..
Because Obama worked so well, why not roll out the new and improved Ramabama for '24...
Another Rishi Sunak WEF type fraud...,
I never trusted him from Day 1!
Good job. Thanks!
Another self-promoter
This is excellenct due diligence on Ramaswampy. Only 2 things I would add. I read his parents were of the Brahmin caste in India; think entitlement on steroids.
One account I read said he was given the drug by Pfizer which had found it didn't work.
Thank you for completely uncovering the deception of Vivek Ramaswampy. What a snake this Vivek is? Unfortunately, even so, this Vivek seems to be better than traitor Mike Pence.
Exactly: it's plausible that they are trying to convince Trump to have him as VP, so Vivek can backstab Trump again exactly as Pence did. They need a mason VP, especially if Trump dies!
Think about it: why would a person, with nearly a billion dollars to enjoy life, spend 10 million on his own campaign, knowing beforehand that he has no chance whatsoever to win against Trump... and even if Trump is vanished (lawfare, assassination, natural death), Vivek has no chance against a proven Governor like DeSantis: Vivek has zero political experience and connections!
The 2020 and 2022 rigged and stolen elections (it’s the machines!):
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-2020-american-coup
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/david-rockefeller-illuminati
I agree with your excellent analysis.