First, I appreciate you taking the time to communicate with me. I am happy to discuss it with you.
Regarding your links:
Cornusav: 404 errors; no information of their own. Bibliography is extensive; it will take time to go through it. But I will. However, it looks offhand like someone is conflating nanotechnology that is considerably large…
First, I appreciate you taking the time to communicate with me. I am happy to discuss it with you.
Regarding your links:
Cornusav: 404 errors; no information of their own. Bibliography is extensive; it will take time to go through it. But I will. However, it looks offhand like someone is conflating nanotechnology that is considerably larger than what would go through a needle used for vaccines. I see the site is promoting chlorine dioxide. I'm not convinced that is even safe, let alone effective.
Bluetoothpolice got me to a page which is in a Slavic language which is neither Russian nor Ukrainian, and I'm not sure which other language it is yet, maybe Bulgarian. I will have to spend some time to read. It doesn't look offhand like a site that is particularly trustworthy, and it doesn't look offhand like it addresses our issue. I could be wrong. (I was unable to find a page in English; I didn't try any other language. I may do that when I have more time. I read 17 languages.)
Rumble: hearing loss prevents me from being able to make use of your video.
Yandex: a search engine. For me to make use of it in this context, I'd need to know your search terms.
If I have a way to get back to you when I've looked at the bibliography, I will.
My position is that even if you manage to demonstrate that the claims are true (which I still don't agree with) it is not what we should be emphasizing simply because it is too controversial, makes us look like fools, may well be planted information precisely for that purpose, and there is simply so much else wrong with the shots that we don't need those claims. And I will continue to assert that position, even if it seems there may be some truth to them. It simply isn't wise.
I know. I tried to get both English and Spanish, but nothing happened. I'm OK with Bulgarian. I could read it with a dictionary if I had the time, but since I don't, Google Translate works well. And in order to read it with a dictionary, I'd have to have a Bulgarian dictionary, but I do not. I got what I needed to know from the Bulgarian. They are using a lot of studies that are irrelevant, speculative, or misrepresent or misinterpret the evidence. This seems to be a problem with this issue. Thank you for writing.
I was just thinking to help as I see the page in En with a language selector. I find your explanation extremely interesting. Thank you for taking the time for clarifications.
First, I appreciate you taking the time to communicate with me. I am happy to discuss it with you.
Regarding your links:
Cornusav: 404 errors; no information of their own. Bibliography is extensive; it will take time to go through it. But I will. However, it looks offhand like someone is conflating nanotechnology that is considerably larger than what would go through a needle used for vaccines. I see the site is promoting chlorine dioxide. I'm not convinced that is even safe, let alone effective.
Bluetoothpolice got me to a page which is in a Slavic language which is neither Russian nor Ukrainian, and I'm not sure which other language it is yet, maybe Bulgarian. I will have to spend some time to read. It doesn't look offhand like a site that is particularly trustworthy, and it doesn't look offhand like it addresses our issue. I could be wrong. (I was unable to find a page in English; I didn't try any other language. I may do that when I have more time. I read 17 languages.)
Rumble: hearing loss prevents me from being able to make use of your video.
COGforlife: contains information about the use of murdered baby tissue in vaccines available in US and Canada. I said the vaccines which are not tainted are from Russia and China. Here is a link that tells about Covid "vaccines" from the world: https://lozierinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/CHART-Analysis-of-COVID-19-Vaccines-02June21.pdf
Yandex: a search engine. For me to make use of it in this context, I'd need to know your search terms.
If I have a way to get back to you when I've looked at the bibliography, I will.
My position is that even if you manage to demonstrate that the claims are true (which I still don't agree with) it is not what we should be emphasizing simply because it is too controversial, makes us look like fools, may well be planted information precisely for that purpose, and there is simply so much else wrong with the shots that we don't need those claims. And I will continue to assert that position, even if it seems there may be some truth to them. It simply isn't wise.
Bluetoothpolice has language selection on top right..
https://bluetoothpolice.com/
I know. I tried to get both English and Spanish, but nothing happened. I'm OK with Bulgarian. I could read it with a dictionary if I had the time, but since I don't, Google Translate works well. And in order to read it with a dictionary, I'd have to have a Bulgarian dictionary, but I do not. I got what I needed to know from the Bulgarian. They are using a lot of studies that are irrelevant, speculative, or misrepresent or misinterpret the evidence. This seems to be a problem with this issue. Thank you for writing.
I was just thinking to help as I see the page in En with a language selector. I find your explanation extremely interesting. Thank you for taking the time for clarifications.
Adriana, you're welcome. I do my best to provide accurate information and combat the tactics of our enemies.