Electric Vehicles cause cancer
Electric Vehicles cause cancer
Elon's top secret
In order to understand the topic, it’s advisable to study why masonic Agenda 2030 defies science. Start by asking why none of this is taught at schools or covered by dominant media:
Fossil fuels are renewable energy
Note: fossil energy can be replaced, not fossils.
There are a lot of alternative energy sources to replace fossil energy. For example:
Syngas
Out of natural gas or liquid hydrocarbons
For example, wood gasification (vegetable carbon) or out of bio-methane (renewable natural gas by upgrading biogas).
You can make syngas energy out of water:
C + H2O → CO + H2
CO + H2O → CO2 + H2
With nuclear power ($1 of uranium turns into $48K of electricity), you can make fuel out of thin air!
Note: the captured elements (hydrogen + carbon) are released back after burning.
Speight, James G. (2002). Chemical and process design handbook. McGraw-Hill handbooks. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. p. 566. ISBN 978-0-07-137433-0.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306261920309272
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360128522000041
Fuel out of waste
With biomass you can produce bio-ethanol, bio-methanol, hydrogen.
Cars could even run on used-cooking oil and pick-ups can run with the gasification of wood or bio-waste/garbage !
There’s no climate emergency
They are causing global warming by geoengineering
I’ll soon write with lots of evidence about this deliberate man-made global warming, which has nothing to do with fossil fuels or burping cows.
They are using EMFs from a swarm of over 40 thousand satellites, thousands of ground weather radars and millions 5G antennas, to dissolve clouds to reduce rain (to increase climate-alarmism, food prices and famine) and to increase global albedo (thus average day temperatures).
EMFs cause cancer
Oxidative stress, inflammation, and cancer: How are they linked?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0891584910005381
https://www.sott.net/article/483510-EMFs-a-possible-human-carcinogen
Even the US Government recognizes the risk:
yet the FCC is breaking the law!
More evidence:
https://www.emfhazard.net/health/numerous-studies-show-emf-health-effects/
https://www.cancertutor.com/emf/
https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/emfs-linked-cancer-autoimmunity-immune-dysfunction
Censored by YouTube: a professor of toxicology explains how EMFs cause biological damage and even cancer
http://www.wakingtimes.com/researcher-explains-how-electromagnetic-fields-damage-your-health/
Cell phones injure children more than adults:
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7335557
https://www.shieldyourbody.com/children-emf/
Keep updated:
EVs cause cancer
EMFs cause cancer (cf. above)
EVs produce carcinogenic EMFs
Conclusion: EVs cause cancer
People are riding on a 400 V high-wattage power line!!!
you… shouldn’t.
Why would you sit on top of a high voltage power line, when there’s a 100 meters/300 feet safety prohibition to build/live near them?
Note: the bear has nothing to do with the topic, but it was an amazing picture showing a nest close to a power line.
“Without fail many malformations will be found on birds who had been living in the nest on the electrical transformer.”
Why would people want to sit on top of a carcinogenic power line many hours per day/week?
400 V x 125 amps = 50,000 watts … That’s huge!
That’s 30 times more than your home outlet (average residential circuit): 110 V x 15 amps = 1650 watts (less common is 20A x 120V = 2400 watts before the breaker trips)
A watt is the amount of power required to perform one joule of work per second:
Now, multiply by the time you are sitting next to the power line, linked to the 80-kWh or 150-kWh battery packs!
That’s not even counting the EMF radiation from the electric engines at the wheels.
For health reasons, governments require 300 feet (100 meters) distance from high voltage power lines and people are sitting on top of one!
The carcinogenic effect of Electro-Magnetic Fields (EMFs) is related to:
Power: car engines must move near 1 ton (1000 kg, 2000 pounds), not a small household appliance.
Distance: damage decreases with the square of the distance (1/d2). That’s the reason in most countries you cannot build near high tension power lines (at least 100 meters/ 300 feet). In an e-car, you are sitting right next to the engine/s and on top of a high voltage electric power line!
Insulation: it is possible to create shields (like the one on the door of your microwave oven) but they don’t eliminate EMFs, only reduce them. The fact that e-cars don’t have such a protection, makes us wonder if they are not effective considering the previous points or maybe the industry doesn’t want to a) increase costs even if it costs your life or b) raise consumer awareness on this issue, which could kill the industry. Think about it: laptops do not comply with the guidelines from the World Health Organization… the recommendation is to place a metal layer beneath it to reduce the proven high carcinogenic effect.
Exposure: the time you spend near injuring EMFs is crucial. It is not the same if you drive 2 hours a day or if you are a professional driver of an e-bus or e-train, just as it is not the same to play the Russian roulette one time or a thousand times: you could get killed at the first time or never but epidemiologically, it will eventually show up.
Conclusions
Almost certainly, higher cancer rates are correlated to years of EV ownership compared to years of combustion-car ownership.
The EMF’s carcinogenic effect is worse on babies and toddlers (nb leukemia).
It’s worse on electric trucks, buses, trains and trams.
Ask politicians to:
a) stop regulations artificially killing the combustion engine and
b) avoid promoting electric buses, cars, trams, trains without effective shielding
Epidemiologically, combustion cars are the lesser evil. They generate carcinogenic fumes but they dissipate in the air, unless you live in a terribly enclosed city without winds like Santiago of Chile. Still, you are not directly injuring the passengers like with EVs.
Also, ICVs are more eco-friendly than EVs:
Is it true that Tesla cars use more energy than conventional ones?
Go green with gasoline!
Do not believe tobacco-science funded by masons behind Governments, Foundations and Universities.
Remember how anti-scientific environmentalists like Greenpeace, promoted the Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs), even if it was proven that they had neuro-toxic mercury and that they consumed more energy in a cradle to tomb analysis.
The modern “politically correct”, is scientifically incorrect. Politicized science is bad science!
Why is there any interest in censoring this life-saving information?
Because of 2 reasons:
1.1. It’s part of an extermination agenda through cancer:
1.2. It’s part of an extermination agenda through deliberate targeted “EVaccidents” (including accelerating into a death trap or causing the batteries to burn by fast draining energy):
That uncontrollable acceleration out of a ferry boat leading to death, happened with an ICV Suzuki Grand Nomade in 2022, possibly a vaxident, but gives an idea of the potential to murder thorough an AI powered autopilot.
2. It’s part of the digi-tatorship, where you would be blocked from accessing your EV or accessing out of the 15 minute city-prison:
This article took many hours. Please share to save lives!
If you like it, please consider a paid subscription:
or please consider “buy me a coffee”:
or you could show your love in the tip jar =)
Solutions against the global tyranny
The PLAN revealed
October 1, 2022
Laws to exit planet prison
·
May 2, 2023
Solutions for "this" Democracy?
November 14, 2022
Rethinking science
December 19, 2023
Call to action
1. Please share in social networks!
10 shares = waking up more people + author’s especial gratitude!
2. If you didn’t receive this by email, please subscribe:
3. Show your love in the tip jar =)
(1 dollar makes a difference)
4. Please consider a paid subscription:
5. Please consider commissioning an article for the topic of your preference:
Most important: let’s keep praying for each other and the conversion of our enemies!
When I wrote this, I jumped the gun, confused by the first story I encountered about climate change. I scrolled down and saw that you ARE aware of the climate engineering going on so I'll change this to agree with you! There IS a climate emergency and it's called stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) and solar radiation management (SRM) more generally, geoengineering which is destroying this world in the "geologic blink of an eye".
They are and have been secretly spraying nanoparticle sized aluminum and other metals, along with fungi, viruses and who knows what else, from specially equipped jet aircraft, polluting the sky into a haze of these nearly invisible particles seen as crisscrossing patterns of sharp, white lines which are being used to control the weather by ground based (HAARP) and satellite frequency generating stations. They spread out into a dull, gray haze which blocks up to 75% of the sun's natural rays.
They fall to the earth (after being used to heat up these particles into plasma and create unnatural high and low pressure zones) and are killing the microbiome in the soil, making it impossible to grow anything except their genetically modified, aluminum resistant seeds, a patented hybrid seed engineered by Monsanto and purchased by farmers. In my area, I can't grow ANYTHING and the trees I planted 20 years ago are DYING.
The world isn't nearly as close to climate collapse as the narrative of climate change advocates proclaims, it's exponentially WORSE! This world is very close to collapse now with dozens of deadly feedback loops increasing by the day.
There's a divide created by climate change scientists who have been fomenting this deception upon the people through the weather media channels and universities for decades, all of which protects the REAL truth of what is going on in the skies all over the globe. Go to geoengineeringwatch.org and look around. You won't like what you see.
This is your best article Fred, to the point and short enough to be accessible!